Doing the damn most since I never dragged anyone for using that source before! Anyways, PS3/PS4 will never have a first party exclusive that sells as much as Mario Kart Wii.
People act like Nintendo is King when The N64 underperformed, the GameCube flopped and ended up selling for $99, The Wii did 20M more than the PS3 & XBox 360 including the fact that the Wii was MUCH cheaper and now the Wii U is flopping.
Nintendo hasn't been a home gaming company since the 80s
Doing the damn most since I never dragged anyone for using that source before! Anyways, Sony will never have a first party exclusive that sells as much as Mario Kart Wii.
People act like Nintendo is King when The N64 underperformed, the GameCube flopped and ended up selling for $99, The Wii did 20M more than the PS3 & XBox 360 including the fact that the Wii was MUCH cheaper and now the Wii U is flopping.
Nintendo hasn't been a home gaming company since the 80s
Not Nintendo having 2 flop consoles in a row and still not being bankrupt. What kind of power?
People act like Nintendo is King when The N64 underperformed, the GameCube flopped and ended up selling for $99, The Wii did 20M more than the PS3 & XBox 360 including the fact that the Wii was MUCH cheaper and now the Wii U is flopping.
Nintendo hasn't been a home gaming company since the 80s
I know, poor Nintendo, why do they even stay in business?
Not Nintendo having 2 flop consoles in a row and still not being bankrupt. What kind of power?
Because the GameCube uses Dreamcast quality hardware, The Wii used PS2 quality and the Wii U is now looking as sharp as a budget PS3 game. Cutting costs.
They have their handhelds in which they are King, if you don't count Apple.
Since 1/4 Nintendo consoles did well since the N64, Nintendo are relying on their handheld devices which slay. But you guys are acting like Nintendo have always slayed as a home console, and that is so far from the truth.
So my original point remains, but pat yourself on the back for the enthusiasm.
Since 1/4 Nintendo consoles did well since the N64, Nintendo are relying on their handheld devices which slay. But you guys are acting like Nintendo have always slayed as a home console, and that is so far from the truth.
So my original point remains, but pat yourself on the back for the enthusiasm.
Not you getting pressed over facts. The numbers are there. You can't change them no matter how much you don't like Nintendo so, you just have to deal.
those screenshots come from lazy late-ports, this is the real T.
vii u looks significantly better.
And it is an accepted fact that the gamecube was slightly stronger than the ps double, the xbox being the stronger of the three.
So basically the Wii U has graphics as good as a console from 2006? Cool.
GameCube didn't have better graphics than the PS2. The GameCube media disc could only hold 1.5GB of Data. The PS2/X-Box/PC games could be anywhere up to 4GB, the average being about 2.9GB (although PC games are usually bigger). So the developers would have to have the game run at a lower resolution, and with simple textures because if they didn't they would have to cut the game in half. So most GameCube games had really poor graphics unless they were exclusives in which the games were nowhere near as big.
When the PS3 & 360 came along, we had games that were mostly 15GB. Yet Wii would only support 4GB (and no data was written to the HDD either). So the games ran at PS2 quality, but the Wii wasn't about the graphics anyway (but most games for PS3 & 360 missed the Wii, but games for PS2 also came out on the Wii).
I mean the hardware makes things more complicated, but based on disc capacity alone the argument that the GameCube had better graphics is incorrect. The hardware in the GameCube was also cheap, hence why Nintendo were able to sell them for $99 and still make profit. Overall, they stepped up with the Wii because the of the GameCube.
The X-Box is the strongest, GameCube had the hardware to produce better graphics but because of the restrictions it couldn't, and the PS2 hardware wasn't as good but due to less restrictions the PS2 could produce better graphics.
Because the GameCube uses Dreamcast quality hardware, The Wii used PS2 quality and the Wii U is now looking as sharp as a budget PS3 game. Cutting costs.
They have their handhelds in which they are King, if you don't count Apple.
You are so full of crap
Gamecube itself was significantly ahead of ps2 (was give and take with original xbox)......
Not you getting pressed over facts. The numbers are there. You can't change them no matter how much you don't like Nintendo so, you just have to deal.
The facts are there, but you're twisting them.
If Nintendo underperformed with the N64, flopped with the GC, did slightly better than the PS3 & 360 and flopped with the Wii U, BUT slayed with the Gameboy, GameBoy colour, GameBoy advance, DS & 3DS, where do you think Nintendo gets it's coins from?
And btw I have a DS & Wii. Plus I still use my original NES weekly.
I don't actually have a deep passion of hatred against other consoles.