[lightmyweedmiley]

Originally posted by Kworb

Being an ATRL member is a privilege, not a right.

And that privilege should be taken a way because, why? Because an innocent user wanted to be permabanned then has changed his mind? And now he can never come back because a biased mod said so, EVEN when you KNOW you've unpermabanned many users before at their request, and you KNOW you are only not letting him back because you feel annoyed by his posts, which is the EPITOME of biased. The thing that disgusts me the most is you know you'll get away with it because you've been a user for over a decade and the admins trust you, and they wouldn't dare to demod you or take his story over yours.

You can warn someone for saying the f word, but you can't unban someone at their request when they changed their mind about being permabanned because you don't like them? Even though they've done NOTHING to you. I really thought a 30 year old would know better, I thought ATRL was better than this. Clearly not.

And the worst part is, you'll ignore this post or post some sarcastic comment back, when clearly it isn't fair at all.

[Capital B]

Originally posted by lightmyweedmiley

And that privilege should be taken a way because, why? Because an innocent user wanted to be permabanned then has changed his mind? And now he can never come back because a biased mod said so, EVEN when you KNOW you've unpermabanned many users before at their request, and you KNOW you are only not letting him back because you feel annoyed by his posts, which is the EPITOME of biased. The thing that disgusts me the most is you know you'll get away with it because you've been a user for over a decade and the admins trust you, and they wouldn't dare to demod you or take his story over yours.

You can warn someone for saying the f word, but you can't unban someone at their request when they changed their mind about being permabanned because you don't like them? Even though they've done NOTHING to you. I really thought a 30 year old would know better, I thought ATRL was better than this. Clearly not.

...step away from the computer.

[Mimie]

Instead of asking for a ban... Just don't log in

I shouldn't be talking tho

[memi stan]

This should be good

[RichGirlPlanet]

Originally posted by Katie

If you guys love search so much why don't you marry it?

The wedding has already been planned.

[BlazingLovatic]

Originally posted by lightmyweedmiley

And that privilege should be taken a way because, why? Because an innocent user wanted to be permabanned then has changed his mind? And now he can never come back because a biased mod said so, EVEN when you KNOW you've unpermabanned many users before at their request, and you KNOW you are only not letting him back because you feel annoyed by his posts, which is the EPITOME of biased. The thing that disgusts me the most is you know you'll get away with it because you've been a user for over a decade and the admins trust you, and they wouldn't dare to demod you or take his story over yours.

You can warn someone for saying the f word, but you can't unban someone at their request when they changed their mind about being permabanned because you don't like them? Even though they've done NOTHING to you. I really thought a 30 year old would know better, I thought ATRL was better than this. Clearly not.

And the worst part is, you'll ignore this post or post some sarcastic comment back, when clearly it isn't fair at all.

Things just got real

Originally posted by RichGirlPlanet

The wedding has already been planned.

I'll be waiting for my invite

[BLaCKPoWeR]

Search must be a female then.

[KitKat]

Originally posted by RichGirlPlanet

The wedding has already been planned.

Is that why she ran away?

[Allstar]

You mods should check the TV Show threads more often. The amount of spoilers in there is disgusting

[Mimie]

Originally posted by Allstar

You mods should check the TV Show threads more often. The amount of spoilers in there is disgusting

Posting spoilers without spoiler tags should be warnable imo tbh

[Kworb]

Originally posted by lightmyweedmiley

And that privilege should be taken a way because, why? Because an innocent user wanted to be permabanned then has changed his mind? And now he can never come back because a biased mod said so, EVEN when you KNOW you've unpermabanned many users before at their request, and you KNOW you are only not letting him back because you feel annoyed by his posts, which is the EPITOME of biased. The thing that disgusts me the most is you know you'll get away with it because you've been a user for over a decade and the admins trust you, and they wouldn't dare to demod you or take his story over yours.

You can warn someone for saying the f word, but you can't unban someone at their request when they changed their mind about being permabanned because you don't like them? Even though they've done NOTHING to you. I really thought a 30 year old would know better, I thought ATRL was better than this. Clearly not.

And the worst part is, you'll ignore this post or post some sarcastic comment back, when clearly it isn't fair at all.

SOTDH is not innocent. He is a very disruptive member who constantly trolls and keeps getting banned anyway. Might as well make it permanent.

[Lee!!]

Originally posted by Allstar

You mods should check the TV Show threads more often. The amount of spoilers in there is disgusting

Its kind of hard to avoid spoilers once something has aired but the "general rule" on most sites is 24 hours, then it's fair game. Lots of the threads here are discussion posts so its hard to prevent spoilers. If you don't want to be spoiled, avoid the thread until you have watched and can discuss, or send Carrie's crazy ass on them lol

[Allstar]

Originally posted by Lee!!

Its kind of hard to avoid spoilers once something has aired but the "general rule" on most sites is 24 hours, then it's fair game. Lots of the threads here are discussion posts so its hard to prevent spoilers. If you don't want to be spoiled, avoid the thread until you have watched and can discuss, or send Carrie's crazy ass on them lol

They're spoiling episodes that have yet to air, though.

[Lipton]

Originally posted by MiMiLamb

Posting spoilers without spoiler tags should be warnable imo tbh

It is.

I have punched a few girls out for that.

[Kworb]

We should probably enforce spoilers to be in [spoiler] tags. I haven't entered the OUAT thread since being spoiled there.

[lightmyweedmiley]

Originally posted by Kworb

SOTDH is not innocent. He is a very disruptive member who constantly trolls and keeps getting banned anyway. Might as well make it permanent.

I haven't seen him troll for months, he even stayed on the site for MONTHS without getting banned. Adding an extra r to Nelly Furtado's name as a harmless joke really bothers you that much? 13 year olds aren't allowed to have any sort of fun on an internet music forum?

First of all, he was banned at HIS request, so YOU as mods are obligated to unban him at HIS request. Ignoring such just makes you lazy, biased, immature and incompetent.

Where's the logic in any of what you've said? Stop taking your personal problems out on innocent 13 year olds.

[Chunk]

Originally posted by Kworb

We should probably enforce spoilers to be in [spoiler] tags. I haven't entered the OUAT thread since being spoiled there.

There are like 2 new posts for each episode and they hardly contain spoilers.

[Chunk]

Originally posted by Lee!!

Its kind of hard to avoid spoilers once something has aired but the "general rule" on most sites is 24 hours, then it's fair game. Lots of the threads here are discussion posts so its hard to prevent spoilers. If you don't want to be spoiled, avoid the thread until you have watched and can discuss, or send Carrie's crazy ass on them lol

You should just invent a new rule that warns members who post spoilers without the spoiler tag during these 24 hours after the initial airing.

[Kworb]

Originally posted by lightmyweedmiley

I haven't seen him troll for months, he even stayed on the site for MONTHS without getting banned. Adding an extra r to Nelly Furtado's name as a harmless joke really bothers you that much? 13 year olds aren't allowed to have any sort of fun on an internet music forum?

First of all, he was banned at HIS request, so YOU as mods are obligated to unban him at HIS request. Ignoring such just makes you lazy, biased, immature and incompetent.

Where's the logic in any of what you've said? Stop taking your personal problems out on innocent 13 year olds.

This is no way to speak to your elders. You also seem to need some time on the naughty chair.

[Evun]

Originally posted by Evun

So, there's one review of Warrior that will count for Metacritic (from RS).

Can I make a Metacritic review thread or do I have to wait till there are enough reviews that Warrior actually has a Metacritic page?

I want to get it before one of the usual Metacritic thread hoarders does.