[Buyonce1814]

Originally posted by Katyanna

They go there for vacation only. You will never see whites, brown or blacks moving to Saudi, Morocco, Tunisia or any muslim countries in Africa or middles east. Is it not africans are the ones who use a small boats, risking their lives so that they can enter Europe? #poorthem #sucks2Bmuslim.

My cousin works at a school in Saudi where the staff is 70% white (non-muslims) . That's one school out of hundreds. What colour are the Saudis/Moroccans/Tunisians then? What kind of ignorant ******** are you spouting? #pooryou

[TikiMiss]

Originally posted by I. AX

Imagine if everyone published whatever they wanted. They'd be no order.

We have moral philosophy for a reason. There is clearly a distinction between whats right and wrong and offending people and mocking them nationally is not the right thing to do.

We all know every action has a reaction and when the action is offensive what do u expect the reaction to be?

Miss me with this freedom of speech ********. When one of their editors insulted Sarkozy's son and paid a price? where were the freedom of speech advocates?

Hi. Welcome to the internet, where everyone from bored soccer moms to members of ISIS have a platform to voice whatever the hell they want. Yet there's no sense of increased calamity every single day.

Speech is an expression of one's thoughts, one's musings, etc. No one will get arrested or killed for posting "Down with the gov't" online (unless you are living in a repressed society) as ISIS and countless terrorists do regularly on Twitter, youtube, etc. I even defend THEIR right to voice their hatred and anger. The line is only crossed when they act on these thoughts. Which is where the line between hate speech and terrorism is. It's one thing to tweet about hating americans. It's another thing to kill them.

Just as it's one thing to mock religion. It's another thing to KILL in the name of religion.

The former is an essential human freedom. The latter is a barbaric action not even fitting of animals.

[H-I-M]

Originally posted by Buyonce1814

My cousin works at a school in Saudi where the staff is 70% white (non-muslims) . That's one school out of hundreds. What colour are the Saudis/Moroccans/Tunisians then? What kind of ignorant ******** are you spouting? #pooryou

Of course your cousin does

[jonasha]

Let ISIS seethe. Don't care about any murderers, they can all kill themselves and this world would become a better place

[Buyonce1814]

Originally posted by H-I-M

Of course your cousin does

She actually does though . The bitch got married and moved last year, leaving me friendless

[Iman]

but how are we comparing the internet to the real world?

people will not say about 99% of the things they write on the internet in real life.

[TikiMiss]

Originally posted by Iman

but how are we comparing the internet to the real world?

people will not say about 99% of the things they write on the internet in real life.

The internet is the purest form of humanity, mentally. Which is what makes it such a beautiful and awful place at times.

[Katyanna]

Originally posted by Buyonce1814

My cousin works at a school in Saudi where the staff is 70% white (non-muslims) . That's one school out of hundreds. What colour are the Saudis/Moroccans/Tunisians then? What kind of ignorant ******** are you spouting? #pooryou

You could have at least provide some stats about what you're saying so that at least you'll have a chance for me to believe you. But I'm sure you don't have any or should we ask your 'cousin' if there's any?
Do you know how many muslim people who are illegal immigrant in Europe? I could show some stats but I don't want to embarrass you.
#suckit

[Pure Heroin]

Originally posted by Cain

Sarkozy is a white European, if he gets mad it's normal cause you know he was insulted and if you are insulted you get mad, that's how it works.
Except for Muslims.
Right?

I can't at you comparing these two situations. Of course they are allowed to get mad, but getting mad and pressing charges against someone =/= getting mad and killing 12 people.

[I. AX]

Originally posted by Iman

but how are we comparing the internet to the real world?

people will not say about 99% of the things they write on the internet in real life.

!!!!

Let alone publish it to millions of people

People dont say the **** they say behind a computer most of the time because they know there are consequences.

[TikiMiss]

Originally posted by I. AX

!!!!

Let alone publish it to millions of people

People dont say the **** they say behind a computer most of the time because they know there are consequences.

OK, so then Charlie Hebdo should be punished because they were honest and did not fear consequences? what kinda logic

[TikiMiss]

If those muslim radicals didn't like the fact that the French press protected freedom of speech in the form of Charlie Hebdo, the right move would've been to leave the country. Move somewhere that had Sharia law. Not KILL.

I don't get how there are still people poo-pooing Charlie and defending TERRORISTS KILLING on here

[I. AX]

Originally posted by Drowned_World

But that's exactly what terrorism is all about: causing fear. The cover shows that CH are not afraid at all, so in that regard it's very effective. The only thing I'm concerned about is the depiction of Mohammed because it might come off as offensive to quite a lot of people. Then again, I guess being controversial and provocative is what makes Charlie Hebdo Charlie Hebdo.

Thats cool and all but when the terrorists retaliate dont you think the'd have some blame in the lives that God forbid would have been lost?

[Skywalker]

It's hysterical how people think that satire shouldn't exist because it might offend someone. Lmfao.

[TikiMiss]

Originally posted by Meowster

It's hysterical how people think that satire shouldn't exist because it might offend someone. Lmfao.

they dumb

[I. AX]

Originally posted by TikiMiss

OK, so then Charlie Hebdo should be punished because they were honest and did not fear consequences? what kinda logic

So now insulting people is being honest?

[artpop]

Originally posted by Rihhyonce

!!!

Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X (a Muslim), Gandhi, and Susan B. Anthony were fighting for civil rights and equaity.

Charlie Hebdo and #JeSuisCharlie is fighting for the right for white people in France to sit in cafes and laugh at racist cartoons while they sip their morning coffee.

The comparison is baffling.

You sound incredibly ridiculous. You have no argument and clearly have no idea what the situation is at hand, I suggest you stop trying.

[TikiMiss]

Originally posted by I. AX

So now insulting people is being honest?

That's the whole NATURE of satire

SNL had a skit with Hillary ****ing Barack Obama
South Park made Sadam Hussein into Satan's lover
Joan Rivers, Chris Rock, etc have built entire careers off of being offensively honest and truthful

Without comedians and satirists, we are left with no true mirrors of ourselves and our hypocrisies.

I bet you all sided with North Korea on the whole Interview thing

[Iman]

religion is like another form of law and order in society. you just cant blatantly disrespect/disregard it like that. if thats the case, maybe we should get rid off every law in society so people should be free to do whatever they want.

[H-I-M]

Originally posted by Meowster

It's hysterical how people think that satire shouldn't exist because it might offend someone. Lmfao.

And that they have the right to kill people because they attacked their religion

The fact that some people here are defending such behavior and mentality...