"Oh I know you didn't claim. I was just correcting your misinformation again. "
All I ever gave on this point was opinions that I made very clear were opinions. This is not misinformation and you corrected nothing you just gave your opinions and then claimed to be more credible than I am. I don't really care either way though so whatever.
"Your gaga fanism is showing. I don't take examiner as a reliable source. The fact is, it was HEAVILY discounted all around the world, much more discounted than ANY album. It's a factual piece of information. In Spain, her gold certification was even taken away because the discounts were too low for the sales to count."
You see I don't know if it was the most discounted or not and I dunno if you know this either.
Since when did that gold certification thing have anything to do with album price? it turned out she didn't meet the requirements after all, I can find nothing about price. Link please to a credible source?
You see you keep calling me biased which ofc I am but you have obviously spent allot of time reading hate articles about gaga and artpop. So shall we just agree that we are both biased?
"Not once have I spoken down to you, you just really have an issue with being wrong and you've been wrong a lot in this conversation" Gurl just give it up. I don't respect dishonest people, I just don't. We both made mistakes, I am just the only one being honest about them.
"That you should take a seat. How many times do you need to be wrong," By you? well once would be nice. Ok fine there was the she gets paid thing but that wasn't completely wrong and it was only half of the point I was making. Other than that though you have nothing.
"do we have to go through every point you have made and systematically prove that you don't know what you're on about?"
I have a feeling you will try....
" - That would be treating you like a child, but i'd be more than happy to do it for someone as special as you."
More digs and insults, yay for me
"I post one opinion that I stated was an opinion from the start and we get to this. You asserted that interscope pays Billboard to write about her? Where is the evidence for that? "
"No, i said gaga ads were on rotation on the main page (they also had links to buy artpop on ads in stories) you know how advertising works right, and how online real estate works? - Actually, what am i saying. Of course you don't."
Oh I assumed you meant the articles. Because you said this "-Billboard had 4 lady gaga stories on rotation on their main page (that isn't free you know)"
See you said stories not ads, you twist things hun, do you even know that you do that?
"Yes, you should be grateful. Me being nice (in the beginning) was real."
No, it was never real. We both know this so why pretend?
It's not that serious
Ok I will see you around sis. 
