|
Celeb News: Taylor Nation™ makes Little Mix post copyright on IG photo
Member Since: 1/2/2014
Posts: 6,830
|
Mess
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/26/2012
Posts: 37,592
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/12/2012
Posts: 18,340
|
Quote:
Originally posted by revel8
Actually you are wrong. The credits for that photo are a clear indication that the photo was taken by the concert photographer employed by Taylor to take photographs at her concerts on this tour. Every major artist will have one photographer getting paid to do this. An artist pays the photographer an agreed wage and the artist owns the photographs as agreed by the contract.
Mike Lerner, a concert photographer well known for his photos of Justin Bieber and Katy Perry explains why you are wrong.
https://soundcloud.com/mike-lerner-1...nt-have-rights
Mike Lerner was named the 4th Best Photographer by Complex Mag in 2012.
You can thank me later for educating you on this subject and saving you from more embarrassment.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 8,093
|
Quote:
Originally posted by #JC
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 7,793
|
Quote:
Originally posted by #JC
|
Your links from petapixel are irrelevent and out of date. Since then they have already successfully agreed a deal with Taylor that is acceptable to them. Are you just overlooking that fact or just displaying more ignorance on the issue?
The link I provided you was an audio file recorded a month ago from Mike Lerner explaining how concert photography works with regards to contractual obligations. Mike Lerner is a well known photographer with years of experience in the industry. He is a professional photographer and understands how the concert photography industry actually works. He has had clients like Jaguar, Calvin Klein, GAP, Island Def Jam. He has photographed the likes of Katy Perry, Drake, Justin Bieber, Miguel, Elton John, Paul McCartney, Tim McGraw, Miley Cyrus. If you want to call them D List then again that is just more ignorance on your part.
The audio file was pertinent because it explained my point that all major artists employ photographers to take photos at their concerts. The photo referred to in the OP was taken by this photographer hence the credits being owned by the artist. It is a straightforward concept and explained in the audio file. If you fail to understand the situation despite my posts and the audio file then I cannot help you. I am not going to draw you a diagram. I am not a special needs teacher.
Long story short. you were wrong. I educated you. You started crying and then began rambling about an issue that had already been resolved.
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/10/2012
Posts: 8,317
|
Quote:
Originally posted by revel8
Your links from petapixel are irrelevent and out of date. Since then they have already successfully agreed a deal with Taylor that is acceptable to them. Are you just overlooking that fact or just displaying more ignorance on the issue?
The link I provided you was an audio file recorded a month ago from Mike Lerner explaining how concert photography works with regards to contractual obligations. Mike Lerner is a well known photographer with years of experience in the industry. He is a professional photographer and understands how the concert photography industry actually works. He has had clients like Jaguar, Calvin Klein, GAP, Island Def Jam. He has photographed the likes of Katy Perry, Drake, Justin Bieber, Miguel, Elton John, Paul McCartney, Tim McGraw, Miley Cyrus. If you want to call them D List then again that is just more ignorance on your part.
The audio file was pertinent because it explained my point that all major artists employ photographers to take photos at their concerts. The photo referred to in the OP was taken by this photographer hence the credits being owned by the artist. It is a straightforward concept and explained in the audio file. If you fail to understand the situation despite my posts and the audio file then I cannot help you. I am not going to draw you a diagram. I am not a special needs teacher.
Long story short. you were wrong. I educated you. You started crying and rambling about an issue that had already been resolved.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/12/2012
Posts: 18,340
|
Quote:
Originally posted by revel8
Your links from petapixel are irrelevent and out of date. Since then they have already successfully agreed a deal with Taylor that is acceptable to them. Are you just overlooking that fact or just displaying more ignorance on the issue?
The link I provided you was an audio file recorded a month ago from Mike Lerner explaining how concert photography works with regards to contractual obligations. Mike Lerner is a well known photographer with years of experience in the industry. He is a professional photographer and understands how the concert photography industry actually works. He has had clients like Jaguar, Calvin Klein, GAP, Island Def Jam. He has photographed the likes of Katy Perry, Drake, Justin Bieber, Miguel, Elton John, Paul McCartney, Tim McGraw, Miley Cyrus. If you want to call them D List then again that is just more ignorance on your part.
The audio file was pertinent because it explained my point that all major artists employ photographers to take photos at their concerts. The photo referred to in the OP was taken by this photographer hence the credits being owned by the artist. It is a straightforward concept and explained in the audio file. If you fail to understand the situation despite my posts and the audio file then I cannot help you. I am not going to draw you a diagram. I am not a special needs teacher.
Long story short. you were wrong. I educated you. You started crying and then began rambling about an issue that had already been resolved.
|
Clearly it hasn't been resolved or this thread wouldn't even exist to begin with, or am I looking at a different OP? Because what I'm seeing is Taylor's company claiming a picture someone else took and they don't even care to give the proper credit as a respectable company, news outlet, syndication, etc would rightfully do so.
Long story short. Taylor doesn't care about you and much less for the other "small artists" that work for her. Have several seats.
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 7,793
|
Quote:
Originally posted by #JC
Clearly it hasn't been resolved or this thread wouldn't even exist to begin with, or am I looking at a different OP? Because what I'm seeing is Taylor's company claiming a picture someone else took and they don't even care to give the proper credit as a respectable company, news outlet, syndication, etc would rightfully do so.
Long story short. Taylor doesn't care about you and much less for the other "small artists" that work for her. Have several seats.
|
I have already explained the situation to you several times. You have already explained your ignorance to me several times.
The photo was taken by the concert photographer employed by Taylor. How many times must I explain this to you?
TAS Rights Management own the rights to the photos that are taken by the concert photographers who are employed by Taylor. This photo in the OP is just one of them.
You are getting confused by the difference between official concert photographers who are paid by the artist and random photographers who are sent by various media organisations who then hope to sell photos to the media.
Long story short. You embarrassed yourself with your lack of comprehension of the situation. How much free education do you want me to give you? I am not your tutor.
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/15/2013
Posts: 10,989
|
Quote:
Originally posted by mosspillows
Hitlor should be more grateful LM graced her **** concert with their vocals
|
nOT HITLOR.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 13,434
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 3,669
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 8,093
|
Quote:
Originally posted by #JC
Clearly it hasn't been resolved or this thread wouldn't even exist to begin with, or am I looking at a different OP? Because what I'm seeing is Taylor's company claiming a picture someone else took and they don't even care to give the proper credit as a respectable company, news outlet, syndication, etc would rightfully do so.
Long story short. Taylor doesn't care about you and much less for the other "small artists" that work for her. Have several seats.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/12/2012
Posts: 18,340
|
Quote:
Originally posted by revel8
I have already explained the situation to you several times. You have already explained your ignorance to me several times.
The photo was taken by the concert photographer employed by Taylor. How many times must I explain this to you?
TAS Rights Management own the rights to the photos that are taken by the concert photographers who are employed by Taylor. This photo in the OP is just one of them.
You are getting confused by the difference between official concert photographers who are paid by the artist and random photographers who are sent by various media organisations who then hope to sell photos to the media.
Long story short. You embarrassed yourself with your lack of comprehension of the situation. How much free education do you want me to give you? I am not your tutor.
|
Still trying to defend the indefendible. Praying 4 U.
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 7,793
|
As I said the issue has been resolved. The photographers organisations have sorted it out with Taylor last month. Claims to the contrary are simply nonsense.
Quote:
Mickey H. Osterreicher, the National Press Photographers Associations general legal counsel said the following
"Ms. Swift should be commended for showing by example her concern not only for the rights of musicians but for the rights of the photographers and organizations that cover her concerts," Osterreicher said tonight.
"After taking the time to hear our concerns regarding her world tour photography guidelines agreement, the news and professional associations and Taylor’s team are very pleased to have been able to work together for a revised agreement that is fair to everyone involved."
These groups were involved in reaching the revised agreement: American Society of Media Photographers, American Society of News Editors, Associated Press, Associated Press Managing Editors, Associated Press Photo Managers’ Association of Alternative Newsmedia, E.W. Scripps Company, Gannett Company, Inc., New York News Publishers Association, News Media Coalition, Newspaper Association of America, Online News Association, Radio Television Digital News Association, and the Society of Professional Journalists
|
https://nppa.org/node/72108
The only people still complaining about this issue are just the pressed and the ignorant.
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 7,793
|
Quote:
Originally posted by #JC
Still trying to defend the indefendible. Praying 4 U.
|
Still acting pressed by Taylor I see.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/7/2015
Posts: 34
|
Little Mix and Taylor are queens af but seriously Tay gets mad about every little thing..:
|
|
|
Member Since: 2/5/2014
Posts: 2,617
|
I can't at you guys trying to drag Taylor at every minimum social media dumb detail since her music career is so drag-proof/almost flawless, and you guys are probably listening to 1989 while in this thread. So, who wins?
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 7,352
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Skin&Bone
I can't at you guys trying to drag Taylor at every minimum social media dumb detail since her music career is so drag-proof/almost flawless, and you guys are probably listening to 1989 while in this thread. So, who wins?
|
Well not her, since her haters may be listening to the album but they sure as hell aren't giving her their coins lbr
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/7/2015
Posts: 1,819
|
Quote:
Originally posted by *Tim
Well not her, since her haters may be listening to the album but they sure as hell aren't giving her their coins lbr
|
Actually yeah, she still wins. Taylor could completely give up on this album and move on to her next era and it'll still be one of the biggest and strongest albums pop music has seen.
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 778
|
I don't know what Tay is trying to prove woth all of these
|
|
|
|
|