We won, why does there need to be a tiebreak when we were quicker?
How are so sure that you guys won when Matty himself stated that we won in the first place...then you bring in the team thing. If it is then Mr. Duff should be HOH solely
If this was a solo game then Mr. Duff won, I agree with that totally. Seeing as it is still about teams, then Forrest and I won. There's no debating that, we were quicker. It's very simple. Having a tiebreaker wouldn't be fair to us.
How are so sure that you guys won when Matty himself stated that we won in the first place...then you bring in the team thing. If it is then Mr. Duff should be HOH solely
And you know who Mr. Duff will evict
Nominate. The HOH does not control who gets evicted, unless they are influential
If this was a solo game then Mr. Duff won, I agree with that totally. Seeing as it is still about teams, then Forrest and I won. There's no debating that, we were quicker. It's very simple. Having a tiebreaker wouldn't be fair to us.
And not having one would be unfair to me.. if Matty already knows yours and Forrest scores then he should have just told me not to send mine in...and I'm not saying this to blame him.
That would have spoiled the HOH for everyone if he told you that we won. If you're referring to the vote, then I've got the votes That's not how this works though. We already won. End of discussion.
That would have spoiled the HOH for everyone if he told you that we won. If you're referring to the vote, then I've got the votes That's not how this works though. We already won. End of discussion.
Lmao..its end of discussion now but why wasnt it end of discussion when Matty had us as HOH...