|
Poll: Is Kelly Clarkson the vocal chameleon of this generation ?
View Poll Results: Is Kelly Clarkson the vocal chameleon of this generation ?
|
Yes
|
  
|
99 |
54.70% |
No
|
  
|
82 |
45.30% |
Member Since: 3/9/2011
Posts: 11,102
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Rolland
OMFG! I love you.
Genious, GENIOUS bro.

|
At least you and I know who's the real vocal chameleon. 
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/16/2012
Posts: 3,306
|
Quote:
Originally posted by KevinKDC
Why is this thread still active ? 
|
cause there is one ATRL memeber here who just can't seem to get enough of Kelly's fans.. he complains about them in countless threads and even goes into threads that are clearly going to be littered with them just so he can complain about them again.
It's so sad.
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/28/2011
Posts: 13,440
|
The pressed will be pressed, but..
Results speak for themselves. When will your faves?
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/3/2010
Posts: 6,762
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Addicted
Why would you ask a question and then say and boom I destroy you with just that? You clearly knew she hadn't done that type of music. What kind of Genious.
Doesn't change the fact shes still the chameleon. 
|
Aren't you all claming she's the most versatile vocalist of this generation?
That does not make it look legit. But ok, I'll let you dream.

|
|
|
Member Since: 9/3/2010
Posts: 6,762
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Addicted
But sis, you're the one sounding off practically bawling in 2 active Kelly threads
I think Kelly has a great voice, the one-dimensional "shade" doesn't deserve a response because we all know it's the answer of the ridiculously pressed. 
|
I was here, answering the question. You didn't like what I said, you all know the rest.
How exactly is she the most versatile vocalist if there's another vocalist who have done way more genres?
I'm just using your logic to prove you wrong. That's all.
Bye, thanks for the time.
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/28/2011
Posts: 13,440
|
The point is pretty simple for those with the capability to grasp it. Kelly might not have done a merengue, bolero, ranchero or salsa song, but if/when she does, you can bet she'll slay the **** out of it. That, my friends, is the point. It's not what she's done, it's what can't she do? The answer is almost literally nothing. I'm not about to say she's the greatest vocalist EVER, but this generation of pop singers? Without a doubt. Christina is talented as ****. I'd never deny her that.. hell I paid $525 for a front row seat to her damn concert, but she's never blown me away vocally like Kelly has. Never evoked such emotion in me that Kelly has. Sure, this could be personal taste, but that's all anyone's opinion really is. This is my opinion. Doesn't make it right. Doesn't make it wrong. For me, Kelly is far and away the vocal chameleon of this generation. Question answered. Donezo.
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/3/2010
Posts: 6,762
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Addicted
If you actually read the posts in here, a lot of people have been posting saying it's not about how many genres you cover but how convincing it is.
Has Christina ever done screamo? So by your logic shes missed one type of music, she isn't versatile?  Just because she misses 2 or 3 certain types of music she isn't a versatile vocalist? The fact is Kelly has sung practically as many genres as Christina, it makes no difference.
You can keep trying though if you like though, it's cute to watch.
|
Quote where I say Kelly is not versatile. I'll be waiting.
I like Kelly, she's one of my Top 10. I'm no way a hater. Yet you all rush to come after me.
And using such cheap things like misspelling.
Anyway, I'm just one of those 66 persons. So, don't be that pressed.

|
|
|
Member Since: 9/3/2010
Posts: 6,762
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Addicted
But I already proved your logic wrong in my previous post. And this post has nothing to do with my logic because I never said Kelly was more versatile because she has more genres than Christina. I said she was versatile because she convincingly sings a lot of genres. I see you reaching for things to say now so maybe its time you exit thread left. Bye.

|
With "You" I mean Kelly stans, not just you, Addicted.
Nor did I. The logic some others used. And now, this is going nowhere.
So let's just stop replying to this.

|
|
|
Member Since: 12/28/2011
Posts: 13,440
|
I mean. At least Christina is a damn good vocalist and if you don't think Kelly is the chameleon, I can understand thinking Christina. I don't have any problem with that line of thought.
It's the Britney ones that I just don't get
But hey, I try to respect everyone's opinion. And I love me some Brit Brit, I just can't. lol
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/16/2012
Posts: 3,306
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Rolland
Quote where I say Kelly is not versatile. I'll be waiting.
I like Kelly, she's one of my Top 10. I'm no way a hater. Yet you all rush to come after me.
And using such cheap things like misspelling.
Anyway, I'm just one of those 66 persons. So, don't be that pressed.

|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/2/2012
Posts: 22,450
|
This thread is a damn mess. So much false tea being spilled.

|
|
|
Member Since: 8/23/2011
Posts: 2,921
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/7/2012
Posts: 11,952
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Rolland
I was here, answering the question. You didn't like what I said, you all know the rest.
How exactly is she the most versatile vocalist if there's another vocalist who have done way more genres?
I'm just using your logic to prove you wrong. That's all.
Bye, thanks for the time.
|
In fact I don't think we really care what you say at all. So stop trollling please.
There are many singers who sing different genres and we appreciate them and we acknowledge them but in our opinion Kelly is the one who is the most versatile and the most convincing according to all her performances, not just the albums and the songs she ever released.
Apperently you're not gonna convince us that we are wrong. Let it be, bro. 
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/16/2011
Posts: 2,482
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/27/2010
Posts: 3,113
|
omg. dead at this thread being created in the first place. 
|
|
|
Member Since: 7/16/2010
Posts: 43,593
|
this poll is bullsh!t to say the least.
Kelly C, Beyoncé, Christina etc. are all versatile vocal chameleons and all of them can sing loads of genres, imo. there is NO best vocal chameleon, since I bet all artsists that are named in this thread could do everything if they want, and every genre and every performance are either loved or hated by people, in the end of the day it is just about taste, but there is also no denying imo. that Kelly is versatile and a vocal chameleon but as much as a Beyoncé or Christina.
I love all 3 ladies, they have incredible voices, and I have a feeling some people have voted on overall preference and not answered the thread honestly as what is asked.
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/19/2012
Posts: 5,155
|
Quote:
Originally posted by J-esper
this poll is bullsh!t to say the least.
Kelly C, Beyoncé, Christina etc. are all versatile vocal chameleons and all of them can sing loads of genres, imo. there is NO best vocal chameleon, since I bet all artsists that are named in this thread could do everything if they want, and every genre and every performance are either loved or hated by people, in the end of the day it is just about taste, but there is also no denying imo. that Kelly is versatile and a vocal chameleon but as much as a Beyoncé or Christina.
I love all 3 ladies, they have incredible voices, and I have a feeling some people have voted on overall preference and not answered the thread honestly as what is asked.
|
All of this.
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/5/2011
Posts: 1,309
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Honey
Mariah Carey still exists, you know. 
|
!!!
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/5/2011
Posts: 16,846
|
Yes!

|
|
|
Member Since: 9/3/2010
Posts: 6,762
|
Quote:
Originally posted by KevinKDC
Yes!

|
You did not.
|
|
|
|
|