Quote:
Originally posted by JesusORGod
Beyonce and Destiny's Child are two separate artist. It doesn't matter if Beyonce was the star of the group or not, it was still a group, not a solo act. I never hear people counting No Doubt's sales when talking about Gwen Stefani as a solo act or include BEPs sales when talking about Fergie as a solo act. Paul McCartney isn't the best selling artist of all time for a reason. Destiny's Child and Beyonce are two different things. They have their sales, records, and certifications, and she has hers ( that's not on Rihanna level because RIhanna's is higher for a solo act).
Yes If we are talking about Bey the artist then she has 4 albums -25 million sold.
But when you tribute Bey (the person) or talk about her overall legacy in pop culture then you you bring up DC because they are part of her as a person. Same with Kelly, Michelle etc. LMFAO, you think because you're so dim so everyone else must be.
|
And yet, as soon as there is any sort of comparative discussion regarding Bey and Rih, there is surely some Navy member that will bring up the fact that Bey had an 8 year head start and wasn't a particular age when she hit certain milestones. You can't have it both ways.
Either she just had a two year headstart that has now been surpassed with studio releases by nearly twice as many albums or she's the nearly two decade veteran with the unfair advantage. Y'all tend to ride with whatever best suits the argument at the moment.