Quote:
Originally posted by dperkins
Yeah I don't get how her being at his place was a good alibi for her, but not for him? Lol
|
There wasn't any evidence that would directly incriminate Annelise, they were only investigating her based on suppositions.
And even though her alibi isnt good enough, I think Nate's fingerprints is more incriminating.
I mean, you can automatically consider Nate's alibi fake since his fingerprints were on the ring, then he's the """killer""".