[Great Username]

A mess at Serena's doubles being on at the same time as Federer/Djokovic. I guess I'll be missing the first set or two of that men's match. Oops. I need Serena to KILL Huber.

[Elle♥]

I am so nervous for tomorrow

[RatedG²]

Originally posted by Great Username

A mess at Serena's doubles being on at the same time as Federer/Djokovic. I guess I'll be missing the first set or two of that men's match. Oops. I need Serena to KILL Huber.

This. Huber is a fat cheater so I hope they destroy her. I loved it when Cara Black and Liezel were number 1 and the Williams Sisters killed them every time they played. It wasn't even close

Originally posted by Elle♥

I am so nervous for tomorrow

Me too. I hope Fed and Murray can pull though

[RatedG²]

Originally posted by Kworb

But Radwanska plays pretty much the same game as Hingis 2006/2007. It's just a fact. Of course Hingis 1997-2001 was way better, but both of their games are based on 0 UE and making the opponent uncomfortable.

I would say Radwanska's game is based off of 0 UE. Hingis was more of an all around type of game, 0 UE meant she was on fire but she also takes the ball early and could generate winners from seemingly defensive positions. I'm not sure if Radwanska could do that yet

[Kworb]

Originally posted by RatedG²

I would say Radwanska's game is based off of 0 UE. Hingis was more of an all around type of game, 0 UE meant she was on fire but she also takes the ball early and could generate winners from seemingly defensive positions. I'm not sure if Radwanska could do that yet

I definitely agree Hingis was way better at hitting winners. But peak Radwanska can also hit some brilliant shots when you think she's already lost the point, her FH CC passing shot in particular.

No two players are exactly the same, but of all the players in the current top 100, the only one that even slightly resembles Hingis is Radwanska.

[RatedG²]

Originally posted by Kworb

I definitely agree Hingis was way better at hitting winners. But peak Radwanska can also hit some brilliant shots when you think she's already lost the point, her FH CC passing shot in particular.

No two players are exactly the same, but of all the players in the current top 100, the only one that even slightly resembles Hingis is Radwanska.

Oh then I definitely agree they are most alike. It should be an interesting matchup tomorrow with probably the best defender on tour (on par with Wozniacki) and the most aggressive player on tour (except for an in-form Kvitova on grass) going at it. I actually think this'll go to 3 sets and I expect a Williams win . Whoever wins though will get my support

[Kworb]

I love Serena too so in the end for me it doesn't matter. I'd be thrilled if she ties Venus's number of Wimbledon wins. Then if she also wins Olympic gold in singles, she'll have tied or bettered all of the relevant career statistics.

[brIt-()nstar]

Looks like it's all going to be about consistency.

Radwanska lacked power but her placements are great so she needs to be cruel and insanely fast when returning before her opponent could react. Serena needs to be consistent with her serves but considering she waltz through this whole tournament, her confidence must be at it's all time high.

[Kworb]

Q. What is the biggest challenge in the finals? Is this an opportunity for you to really use your overpowering skills in this particular matchup?

SERENA WILLIAMS: I think if I try to do too much overpowering I can be led to a lot of errors, so I don’t know about that.

I think my biggest challenge is Agnieszka is really, really good at everything. She has unbelievable hands. She’s running every ball down ‑ every ball down.

It’s going to be challenging. It’s not easy at all. She’s already ranked ahead of me, so I think it will be a really good match.

[RatedG²]

Originally posted by Kworb

Q. What is the biggest challenge in the finals? Is this an opportunity for you to really use your overpowering skills in this particular matchup?

SERENA WILLIAMS: I think if I try to do too much overpowering I can be led to a lot of errors, so I don’t know about that.

I think my biggest challenge is Agnieszka is really, really good at everything. She has unbelievable hands. She’s running every ball down ‑ every ball down.

It’s going to be challenging. It’s not easy at all. She’s already ranked ahead of me, so I think it will be a really good match.

You know some of that is fluff. Like when Agnieszka said early in the tournament "Venus should be seeded because she could definitely win this or another GS tournament." . Every damn person in the world knows Venus is done when it comes to Grand Slams so what she said was merely to be kind to legends, fluff. Aggie will be just like Zheng tbh. Both are great movers and will track down every ball but the difference is that Serena will be so much better since she has her movement as well.

[BRITNEY LICIOUS]

let go Roger!!!!!!!!

[Kworb]

Please Roger don't flop

[Barbarella]

Andy & Roger.

[Kworb]

First set to Roger. Come on girl keep serving like a demon

[Kworb]

Of course that ugly son of a bitch breaks right after I say this

[Great Username]

A mess at Agnieszka faking illness. She's really trying it.

I'm gonna need the rain to go away so Serena can bully Huber, with Venus and Raymond watching on helplessly.

Roger, don't flop in a big match for once k? I can finally root for you now that I don't need Djokovic to take out Nadal.

[Sammi]

Originally posted by Great Username

I'm gonna need the rain to go away so Serena can bully Huber, with Venus and Raymond watching on helplessly.

[Kworb]

One more set Roger

ONE MORE SET

IF YOU LOSE TO HIM AGAIN AFTER HAVING MP



NO NO NO

[Sept]

c'mon Djokovic

[Kworb]

FOUR GAMES

Don't get broken

****ING DON'T GET BROKEN