I don't get this? Some pictures were of the same model guy/girl except one was just a "casual" shot vs a sensual looking straight at you pose... so if you're gay you would always choose the "hot" pic of a guy and if you're straight you choose the "casual" one and vice versa with the pics of girls?
Your score was 4.37. Now, consult the chart below to see what your score means.
Quote:
1 - 3.3 Almost certainly not homosexual, could be heterosexual or bisexual
3.4 - 4 Indeterminate
4.1 - 6 Almost certainly not heterosexual, could be homosexual or bisexual
Quote:
Almost certainly not heterosexual, could be homosexual or bisexual
first of all the majority of the pictures were guys, and more specifically guys against guys like I should be able to decide whether i think this guy is more attractive than this girl or vice versa. like this is an incredibly flawd test and has way too much bias in it to be valid. it was fun but it's incredibly flawd.
2.7 - Almost certainly not homosexual, could be heterosexual or bisexual
What kind of ******** test is this? Gay as the day is long. Plus where was the 'neither, both are ugly as ****' option? I found a lot of them highly unattractive
I think the test just measures your BIAS towards feminine or masculine beauty. That proves very little about sexual attraction. More like your ability to remove yourself from masculine/feminine ideals when examining beauty.
However the correlation graphs show most people clearly dont do that.
Your score was 3.93. Now, consult the chart below to see what your score means.
Range Interpretation
1 - 3.3 Almost certainly not homosexual, could be heterosexual or bisexual
3.4 - 4 Indeterminate
4.1 - 6 Almost certainly not heterosexual, could be homosexual or bisexual