What she's doing is called a product. She's like a wrapper for a new cheap candy or something. Hardly what anyone would assume to be "pop art" or "art" at all.
Even Madonna is more influental without having anything to promote. Katy Perry is not influental. You can't be influental if you're just doing what's trendy. And if you were to say she does take risks, I haven't seen her perfume anywhere or heard about it anywhere outside of ATRL, I don't know anybody who likes the girl that 'sings' the Dr. Luke-written and produced songs rather than her singles. I don't know anybody who has gone to her tour. I haven't seen anybody wear Katy-inspired wigs, dresses, bras ( eventhough Katy's were inspired by Gaga). She's never something people talk about, because there's nothing to talk about.
This is such a ridiculous post. Just because you don't know anybody who went to her tour, she's not influential?
Even Madonna is more influental without having anything to promote. Katy Perry is not influental. You can't be influental if you're just doing what's trendy. And if you were to say she does take risks, I haven't seen her perfume anywhere or heard about it anywhere outside of ATRL, I don't know anybody who likes the girl that 'sings' the Dr. Luke-written and produced songs rather than her singles. I don't know anybody who has gone to her tour. I haven't seen anybody wear Katy-inspired wigs, dresses, bras ( eventhough Katy's were inspired by Gaga). She's never something people talk about, because there's nothing to talk about.
Just read the first sentence:
"Katy has combined everything great about her last record and taken it to the next level"
They keep describing PRISM as TEENAGE DREAM 2 but more serious / dark / mature ... And they think that this is good ? I mean In commercial goal, It Is but ART ?