Quote:
Originally posted by talitaldc
If she hadn't officially left yet, aka STILL in the group, she should've still been in the trademark and profitting from 5H's deals until she wasn't, period. This is proof that she hasn't received payments regarding Fifth Harmony the brand, for months. No group member in their right mind would give up their business-related income because they're "thinking" of leaving, as long as she was a member, she had as much of a right to a profit as the others, which means she wasn't a member by then. That's literally it, what's so hard to comprehend?
|
I don't agree because there is more to it than simply this. I know how these kind of legal document games are played out between parties (in this case solo Camila and 5H and even the label) and it's more complicated than just looking at a trademark and saying someone isn't a member because someone has not been listed. I am 100% that negotiations with all parties involved, including the label have happened throughout the whole year. This trademark is just one piece of a whole bunch of paperwork that made her 'part of Fifth Harmony'.She was still part of the group until she made that final descision in November, nothing less or more. Believe what you wanna believe, but I ensure you that this trademark is not really the game changer and there is so much more to it.