Member Since: 12/22/2011
Posts: 55,626
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Cest_La_Vie
That was awful.
I don't hate the idea, but they really should have used this opportunity to convince THE CONSUMER as to why Tidal is a better option than Spotify, Pandora, etc. They didn't, at all. They're really banking on "you like these people on stage and so you should be loyal to them and only stream their music from Tidal cause they said so."
Chile, bye.
I understand that Spotify doesn't pay artists enough, but their job today was to convince consumers of what's in it for them. Nobody wants to hear people they perceive to be rich whine about not getting paid enough. They want to hear what is in it for THEM and why they should buy into Tidal over the free/much cheaper streaming services that are used to and have been using for years - and it needs to be something besides "it sounds better" cause we've heard that before.
Plus, Jay and his whole crew is about 3-4 years too late with this idea anyway.
|
Wow. Excellent points
|
|
|