Quote:
Originally posted by h.u.r.r.i.c.a.n.e
That's because GRAMMYs have been handed out to many artists in many genres over the years. Literally dozens every year. So when talking about musical legacies its usually more applicable to talk about GRAMMYs because so few people have played the Superbowl. Again, exclusivity.
|
Let's agree to disagree. People like Justin Timberlake, or Britney Spears have both played the Superbowl and won Grammys, and I really doubt they would value their Superbowl perf higher than winning a Grammy. But also, in the case of really legendary artists -the Princes, the Bruce Springsteens, the Tom Pettys of the world-, I don't think they would really give a sh*t about a halftime Superbowl performance. Again, it is only opinion.
Let's just say it is big deal as a performer, but it is not as big as winning a Grammy for your music.