Beyonce doesn't need to Dangle herself on the ceiling to receive acclaim, all that she needs is to appear on stage and teach the lessors on how to werk their weaves off.
Have you heard the studio version of I Was Here?
She is meant to be have two voices, exactly an octave apart. Obviously, she can't sing both simultaneously, live
Death @ her/him ignoring the fact she's harmonizing there and it literally being 9 seconds. 9 seconds from 4 minute song doesn't proove anything, certainly not 'usual singing in unison with pre-recorded vocals' claims Pop gals are singing whole songs to studio version of their vocals, not for 9 seconds.
Beyonce doesn't need to Dangle herself on the ceiling to receive acclaim, all that she needs is to appear on stage and teach the lessors on how to werk their weaves off.
You mean Beyonce can just appear and shake her booty? Everyone can do that.
But not anyone can "dangle" them self in the air, and sound impressive at the same time!
P!nk for sure! The only thing I've ever seen Beyonce do is either be dancing with a LOT of people in the background or just herself singin a ballad. She has never done anything innovative.
P!nk can do incredibly demanding choreography, strip it down to an acoustic set, do acrobatics, play her own instrument, rock it out with a live band, etc. She's daring and inventive. Plus doing all of this without EVER using lip-sync.
Beyonce doesn't need to Dangle herself on the ceiling to receive acclaim, all that she needs is to appear on stage and teach the lessors on how to werk their weaves off.
Death @ her/him ignoring the fact she's harmonizing there and it literally being 9 seconds. 9 seconds from 4 minute song doesn't proove anything, certainly not 'usual singing in unison with pre-recorded vocals' claims Pop gals are singing whole songs to studio version of their vocals, not for 9 seconds.
And reverb is not backtrack
Quote:
Originally posted by Havoc
Umm...that's called HARMONZING.
If she was trying to sing with a backing track, why would she sing a whole OCTAVE below making it insanely obvious.
No matter how many times this thread is made Beyonce's always going to win in the end because that's just reality. When are they gonna learn.
Quote:
Originally posted by MrPeanut
Nope I made one of the threads a couple years ago and Bey won it, though idk why this poll isn't public so the girls can cast their vote out in the open.
Anyway, one gets invited to headline the Superbowl halftime show and huge festivals like Glastonbury and the other is never seeing it. Idk what there is to discuss, even.
Tell me, when you are reading a book, poem, watching a theatre play, performance or a movie to entertain yourself, you dont really expect that it will evoke feelings in you, that it will make you think about something? I certainly do and Beyonces performances failed to do so to me.
I have just answered OPs question and tried to explain why. If you disagree, thats your problem, not mine. Bye.
Not really.
Let's see here..............
1. There are different types of books, poems, plays, performances, etc. Some can spark one's intellectual mind, while the other can just be there for entertainment, which P!nk nor Beyonce's performances are meant to dive into one's intellectual subconscious.
It is meant to entertain, and you just keep discrediting yourself left and right. Performances are meant to be anything BUT intellectual. If you think otherwise......
I'll pray for you
Quote:
Originally posted by Ulrihs
Seems that Beyoncé stans who was not interested in winning pools (as they claimed) still can't let this thread to go.
It's just entertaining to post in.
P!nk fans are the ones who cling to polls. It's just fun watching them squirm seeing the real performer of our generation win
P!nk fans are the ones who cling to polls. It's just fun watching them squirm seeing the real performer of our generation win
And for me it's entertaining to see Hives double standards in full force, as from when Beyonce started to win amount of posts from them in thread increased drastically
1. There are different types of books, poems, plays, performances, etc. Some can spark one's intellectual mind, while the other can just be there for entertainment, which P!nk nor Beyonce's performances are meant to dive into one's intellectual subconscious.
It is meant to entertain, and you just keep discrediting yourself left and right. Performances are meant to be anything BUT intellectual. If you think otherwise......
I'll pray for you
It's just entertaining to post in.
P!nk fans are the ones who cling to polls. It's just fun watching them squirm seeing the real performer of our generation win
A Pink performances is an elegant celebration of human anatomy, music and the magical moments in life.
Her mindset, physique and moves are all representive of raw, primal energy. She takes elements from gymnastics, dance, history and several genres of music to bring together a well-thought yet effortless, "simple" but not "basic" show that tells a story. Her art is a manifestation of who she is a human being, a smart, strong woman, a mom, a free spirit. Her work ethic, her attitude towards lip-syncing, the amount of effort she puts into each show says it all. I'm sorry for the lost souls who are trying not to witness the evolution of a legend in the making. She's pushing the boundaries of human body and entertainment concept and will be remembered for centuries to come.
As for Beyonce; she IS a great performer, one of the best we have, I must say. I just personally think her dance moves and body image perception is degrading towards women and I get the feeling she's showing off with her voice, which is very offputting.
I just love them both so much and they're clearly THE two best performers in the industry. Both amazing women, it's pathetic we all fight like this. (Literally feel like that "SHE DOESN'T EVEN GO HERE" girl)
I know right I slightly prefer beyonce but that doesn't mean that pink is bad. They both are performers like anybody else who have positives and negatives. But this is ATRL so....
A Pink performances is an elegant celebration of human anatomy, music and the magical moments in life.
Her mindset, physique and moves are all representive of raw, primal energy. She takes elements from gymnastics, dance, history and several genres of music to bring together a well-thought yet effortless, "simple" but not "basic" show that tells a story. Her art is a manifestation of who she is a human being, a smart, strong woman, a mom, a free spirit. Her work ethic, her attitude towards lip-syncing, the amount of effort she puts into each show says it all. I'm sorry for the lost souls who are trying not to witness the evolution of a legend in the making. She's pushing the boundaries of human body and entertainment concept and will be remembered for centuries to come.
As for Beyonce; she IS a great performer, one of the best we have, I must say. I just personally think her dance moves and body image perception is degrading towards women and I get the feeling she's showing off with her voice, which is very offputting.
Just stop we are not for certain that pink's performances will be remembered for centuries to come at all. As far as that whole post about pink it is not that serious at all. I don't understand calling beyonce degrading but prasing pink at the same time it makes literally no sense seeing as pink:
And let's not get started on the so what video and seeing her dance naked or other provocative costumes she has worn. What BOTH of them do is not degrading to women seeing as they should be able to express themselves sexually just like the men if they so choose to. Funny how you make that double standard of being sexy degrading, yet when males do it their is no problem.
Pop gals are singing whole songs to studio version of their vocals, not for 9 seconds.
