[iamvladd]

Welp, this email thing isn't over.

Justice Dept. grants immunity to staffer who set up Clinton email server

[King Maxx]

Originally posted by Marvin

Yep, here we are. Racism is still a huge problem, black people are still getting jailed much more often than whites, and the racial wealth gap continues to grow. Talk is cheap. She hasn't done as much as you're trying to make it seem like. You're REALLY overselling it.

But @foxaylove I understand what you're saying. I never disagreed that she hasn't done stuff for black people and minorities in general.

And what did Bernie do for blacks and gays? Nothing. He stood up for us, but being in the Senate with many others who opposed it doesn't do much. Really all a Senate does is vote. It takes more than that to make change. Him and Hillary have been talking about it for decades so it's not a jab to him. At least with Hillary she has gone around the planet talking about these things. You make less sense by the day.

[Retro]

Originally posted by iamvladd

Welp, this email thing isn't over.

Justice Dept. grants immunity to staffer who set up Clinton email server

He was only allowed immunity because he refused to talk otherwise. He invoked his fifth amendment rights in front of Congress or something and this is just him saving his own ass in case a staffer or aide is prosecuted. I've been reading up on the case and just read the articles on this right now.

[Ramcoro]

Originally posted by Retro

He was only allowed immunity because he refused to talk otherwise. He invoked his fifth amendment rights in front of Congress or something and this is just him saving his own ass in case a staffer or aide is prosecuted. I've been reading up on the case and just read the articles on this right now.

Does anyone watch Veep? They made a joke on there that "1/2 of staffers are hired to be fired".

[Ramcoro]

Originally posted by RatedG²

Republicans are babies. They're threatening to run two candidates if Trump is the nominee.

smfh

I'm here for it.

[ralani]

honestly politicians have been claiming to support minorities for decades now and not much has changed so i take anything they say with a grain of salt (@ bernie and hillary)

[jpow]

I just asked this on my Facebook but why is the GOP trying to make Marco Rubio happen? Wouldn't it make sense to try to make Ted Cruz happen more?

[BlueTimberwolf]

I wonder what the staffer needs immunity from?

[like2throw]

Originally posted by jpow

I just asked this on my Facebook but why is the GOP trying to make Marco Rubio happen? Wouldn't it make sense to try to make Ted Cruz happen more?

Ted Cruz is an outsider, the established GOP hate him more than Trump.

[Ramcoro]

Originally posted by LuLuDrops

My friend posted this, wanted to write about California voting late etc but I think I'll just stay silent. Already told him last night, he should know.

Are Neveda and Massachuttes republican states?

[jpow]

Originally posted by LuLuDrops

My friend posted this, wanted to write about California voting late etc but I think I'll just stay silent. Already told him last night, he should know.

oh my

[suneclipse121]

He SKULLDRAGED Trump

Don't know if it was already posted.

[Adonis]

Originally posted by Eros

Like I said initially, I understand the sentiment, and can sort of understand your logic now that you've divulged into it a bit more. But I still stand that by doing so it would in fact derail everything (in an increasingly negative way) and make the presidential candidate platform more polluted with trash than it currently is.

Also, you don't gain the minority support by waiting all the way until SC to pretend to care about their issues and concerns. I would assume that in this new system you're envisioning there would still need to be candidates that have actually put forward an effort to make in roads within those communities. by demonstrating their standing support. They would still need to work to earn it! What you're saying is kind of like doubling down on the fact that Bernie supporters are going around condescendingly preaching to minorities that they aren't making the right decisions for themselves by voting for Clinton. As if the Clintons haven't had a long standing relationship with those voters.

What relationship do they have with minority voters besides photo ops whilst they still do things that harm minorities.

[Temporal]

Originally posted by LuLuDrops

My friend posted this, wanted to write about California voting late etc but I think I'll just stay silent. Already told him last night, he should know.

One of my friends posted this too, it makes no goddamn sense

[LuLuDrops]

The Hill writing about Trump's healthcare plan and keep emphasizing the phrase "similar to Democrats" Think that could upset some of his voters?

[BlueTimberwolf]

Trump just lost A LOT of crossover appeal with that healthcare plan, but I guess he didn't have choice but to go conservative on it

[BlueTimberwolf]

Originally posted by LuLuDrops

The Hill writing about Trump's healthcare plan and keep emphasizing the phrase "similar to Democrats" Think that could upset some of his voters?

Really? I'm hearing a lot of disappointment from Liberals. I think he's trying to have it both ways, which is why it is so thin and non-descriptive. I guess he need to protect himself in debates.

[LuLuDrops]

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf

Really? I'm hearing a lot of disappointment from Liberals. I think he's trying to have it both ways, which is why it is so thin and non-descriptive. I guess he need to protect himself in debates.

It bounces back and forth between what GOP offers and similar to Democrats regarding prescriptions. They did at least three times mention a Dem similarity in the article.

Having it both ways is a great way to put it.

[Ramcoro]

That picture is probably a joke. At least I hope so...

[TikiMiss]

Originally posted by iamvladd

Welp, this email thing isn't over.

Justice Dept. grants immunity to staffer who set up Clinton email server

So two scenarios:

1) the guy is legit scared of being taken down by the FBI/DOJ, and is going to rat out the Clintons.

or

2) he's been in on it with the Clintons since pleading the 5th back in September, and they've finally coordinated their story and picked the right time (the day after Super Tuesday) to agree to testify, so that it doesn't hurt Clinton's chances.

I think the 2nd is more likely.