And, aside from that, I'm arguing that it's nothing more than getting revenge, which I'm sure most of y'all would consider wrong?
I mean, if some man murders my best friend, and I kill him in revenge, it's no different than capital punishment, yet I could go to jail for that.
Don't tell me what the argument is when I'm trying to make my own point.
And yes, I will enjoy eating a deceased animal that was killed to feed me rather than supplying money to the government to help kill another human being out of lust for revenge.
---
And yes, I see your response, but it's an option, and I enjoy eating meat. It was killed with a proper purpose rather than just killing it to kill it; go bitch at poachers who kill for sport rather than people who eat meat.
Just as I'm sure you enjoy wearing leather and though you probably can't afford a real fur coat, you would enjoy wearing that too.
You say killed for food, winterwear > Killed for taking multiple lives or something else completely inhumane (only the most heinous criminals end up on deathrow).
I mean, you're trying to say that murdering is wrong by murdering that person. That's hypocrisy at its finest.
But, I'm not the one in here arguing that "killing is killing no matter what".
I'm not contradicting myself and my argument.
Your logic is literally applicable to my meat argument, but you don't agree with it, that's why you and the rest are hypocrites. That's how you guys are contradicting yourselves.
What part of my argument or logic is applicable to another situation? Please give me an example, I'm sure I'll agree.
i think if a man/woman rapes a child then they deserve the death penalty. Anyone who murders someone, should also have their life taken from them.
And for the death part.. id say lethal injection.
I am on the fence about the penalty, but I disagree with the injection idea. I'm diabetic, so I see injections as something that can save your life. I don't like how it is always associated with ending your life.
Perhaps starvation would work better? Torture then death.
Yes, because I, nor does anybody else, deserve to decide whether someone lives or dies. It doesn't matter what they did, that's on them. Imprison them for eternity if you will, but no one has the right to say you can't live.
STOP. That's on them. Are you joking? I cannot rap my head around this post... So Jerry Sandusky raped countless of helpless boys but 'its on him' so he automatically gets to live.
So you are saying that even though they have mental disabilities they should be PUT DOWN?
In no way am I defending these heathens. But maybe a therapist would do them more good than a lethal injection no??
Depends. If the murderer had schizophrenia or psychosis than maybe. However if they were a psycopath/sociopath than no. Those people lack empathy (that part of their brain is missing) so they will never be cured (least not right now).
This issue is so polarizing, in Spain we don't have death penalty but our justice is so screwed up that many people get away with murder, which makes a big part of society eager for that kind of punishment... On top of that, corruption has spread all over our politics, so a few heads woul roll too if society had to be the one to judge