ATRL: ATRL Feedback & FAQ - Page 11

Matty

Quote:

Originally posted by Monster

i just see either "Warning Received" or "Already Reported."

The posts I quoted in response to his fakeness weren't reported nor warned, so again how am I supposed to know about his own activity? If I'm not there, I can't know what has gone on in previous pages.

Well those were posted within the contents of the Britney thread, where was the fakeness in that?
I'm trying to see where you're coming from

Monster

Quote:

Originally posted by Matty

Well those were posted within the contents of the Britney thread, where was the fakeness in that?
I'm trying to see where you're coming from

He comes to the BTW acting all fake and praising the song and its performance, but then he talks **** about it in the FF thread.

Matty

Quote:

Originally posted by Monster

He comes to the BTW acting all fake and praising the song and its performance, but then he talks **** about it in the FF thread.

I see it now...

Duca

Quote:

Originally posted by Celestial

He's banned for 30 days.

Duca

I think the threads for play count (currently only for "Born This Way" and "We R Who We R)" are completely unnecessary and should be closed.

Michael

Quote:

Originally posted by Duca

I think the threads for play count (currently only for "Born This Way" and "We R Who We R)" are completely unnecessary and should be closed.

I agree.

Monster

Quote:

Originally posted by Duca

I think the threads for play count (currently only for "Born This Way" and "We R Who We R)" are completely unnecessary and should be closed.

Of course you do.

JonnyϟLightning

Can you be reported for conversations?

foxaylove

Quote:

Originally posted by JonnyϟLightning

Can you be reported for conversations?

Conversations where?

JonnyϟLightning

Quote:

Originally posted by foxaylove

Conversations where?

On our profiles.

foxaylove

Quote:

Originally posted by JonnyϟLightning

On our profiles.

If you mean wall-to-wall conversation then NO! Those aren't warn-able.

JonnyϟLightning

Quote:

Originally posted by foxaylove

If you mean wall-to-wall conversation then NO! Those aren't warn-able.

Oh then. I was always keeping it cute... Now I can go all out.

Peep

Quote:

Originally posted by Peep

Dear Moderators

I contact you to complain about a recent (lets say, 10 minutes ago) warning I have received from you. I will quote to you the warning I have received below:

Notice about your recent activity on ATRL
Peep:

You are receiving this message because the ATRL moderators were concerned with your recent activity.

Quote:

Category: Flamebait
Details:

This warning will associate 1 point(s) with your account. Members are banned for one month upon accumulating 10 points, and they are banned permanently upon accumulating 20 points.

Note: These points might expire in the future. You can look up your current total number of warning points by viewing your profile. Click on your user name at the top of any page, and then select the Warnings tab.

Your original post, below, was the cause for concern. Please follow our community guidelines and do not continue to submit posts like the one below. Here is your post, for reference:

http://atrl.net/forums/showthread.php?p=5235446
Quote:
Quote:
Originally posted by DG1 View Post
I wonder if she'll praise her after reading this:

"I am not going to saunter around the stage doing pelvic thrusts and lip-synching." - Lady Gaga in Vogue

Anyways, good to see her acknowledging the Queen of Pop
Like she reads a fashion magazine.

The reasons why I believe this warning is totally wrong are the following;

1. I meant that she has a stylist.
2. I know that she doesn't read those magazines. She simply doesn't have time for it and it was not meant as offensive, it was meant as a compliment (read explenation below)
3. Because she does her own fashion things and knows much better than to read those magazines.
4. I believe the person that reported me thought the msg was Britney = dumb and does not read at all. Which I have not said. I said that Britney sets her own trents, and does not follow magazines, just formulated differently.

I look forward to hearing from you.

With kind regards,

Peep

Any response please? It has been a few days since I PM'ed but I got no response.

It makes me feel that the point is even more unjustified somehow.

Peep

Quote:

Annoying — 1 point, expires in 30 days
One of our moderators has gotten annoyed or frustrated, subjectively, at your post.

Ehmz... this is just a re-formulation for trolled a mod successfully?! Really?!
I don't think this should be in the rules, as it is VERY subjective and will easily be used as a weapon in stanfight outside SYG topic.

Matty

Quote:

Originally posted by Peep

Any response please? It has been a few days since I PM'ed but I got no response.

It makes me feel that the point is even more unjustified somehow.

I don't see how the 4 reasons you gave of why it wasn't flamebait was shortened and translated into that one sentence. I along with the mod who reported it see it as flamebait. Though you don't say Britney is dumb, some stans would see it like that and it would start an argument.

M A R N ✮

agree i said bey was s once but i didnt mean her i was just going on about somthing else.
and got 2 warnings for it

and i support B...annoying

foxaylove

Quote:

Originally posted by Peep

Any response please? It has been a few days since I PM'ed but I got no response.

It makes me feel that the point is even more unjustified somehow.

My inbox has been quite busy, so forgive me if I haven't responded. I am just going through all missed PM's right now. Heck, I even missed a deadline for Matty's game, Big Brother

Anyways, I'm sorry but your point will stand. Matty basically summed it all up for me.

Peep

Quote:

Originally posted by Matty

I don't see how the 4 reasons you gave of why it wasn't flamebait was shortened and translated into that one sentence. I along with the mod who reported it see it as flamebait. Though you don't say Britney is dumb, some stans would see it like that and it would start an argument.

Stans can see whatever they want, I have seen the most delusional people around here...
So are you telling me that as long as I can see a way something can become insulting, it is thus against the rules? That's just nonsense. Text is about what is there, black on white. Not what 100 meanings something could have :S

Matty

Quote:

Originally posted by Peep

Stans can see whatever they want, I have seen the most delusional people around here...
So are you telling me that as long as I can see a way something can become insulting, it is thus against the rules? That's just nonsense. Text is about what is there, black on white. Not what 100 meanings something could have :S

We have received the most ridiculous reports just because stan bases don't like another and we ignore them because they are nothing.
There is a pretty fine line between an opinion and flamebait, so as mods we review it and make those decisions. Some opinions can be extremely strong that it can be considered flamebait, but everyone is entitled to an opinion which makes it difficult to distinguish sometimes. As Celestial said somewhere I believe, that we're going to review the warning system description someday
And from what you said, that I've bolded in your quote, sums up why I questioned how you gave those reasons you gave from that one post you were warned with.

Beatfreak

The site has been pretty slow loading the past couple days.