[pika]

Originally posted by MrPeanut

Nah.

Gaga won't be coming for Katy's record on the Hot 100 with ArtPop, but what I'm really interested in is how it does on the album, airplay, and touring chartseses.

Then make a thread about it and discuss it elsewhere if you're so interested.

[J03Y]

Originally posted by sGabe4

this whole thread is about Female MJ's iconic record shattering 6#1 singles and whether Gaga could break that record.
And just fyi Katy"s least successful single Thinking of you went #1 and platinum in Brazil...

Don't try to back out now just because you're realizing now that you're losing the debate. Finish what you started if you didn't really want this to go off topic you wouldn't have brought any of it up.

And that's lovely. But that wasn't the point nor the subject if this discussion.

[sGabe4]

pika taking ignorant monsters to school and then back home and giving them homework

[pika]

Originally posted by H-I-M

And I never said it was, just simple replying to your " felt off the face of the earth the second week."

"Fell off the face of the earth" is a figure of speech. Of course it sold more copies after its debut (surprisingly), but the resounding outcome is that it was not a hit, and will never be one.

Get them Brazil certifications though.

[LCTV]

why is this a thread when we've heard nothing from the album or even a release date?

[Mastamaind]

Originally posted by pika

What point? As if I'm really bothered Gaga made $6 million more than Katy in 2011. Do you even realize how abysmal that is in the grand scheme of things? But I'm anxious to know what networth has to do with Gaga being able to achieve 5 #1s or not.

Laugh all you want but in this thread y'all guys are bragging about how superior Katy is for her #1s record still in the same year when she got it Gaga made more money than her with her "flop" singles.

I guess she's bad and you're mad.

[MrPeanut]

Originally posted by pika

Then make a thread about it and discuss it elsewhere if you're so interested.

I addressed the topic at hand (fyi: Gaga tying/not tying Katy's Hot 100 record) in my post. Why you care so much what I discuss in addition to that when you didn't even make the thread is beyond me, but it's good to see people being passionate about something these days, I guess.

[sGabe4]

Originally posted by J03Y

Don't try to back out now just because you're realizing now that you're losing the debate. Finish what you started if you didn't really want this to go off topic you wouldn't have brought any of it up.

And that's lovely. But that wasn't the point nor the subject if this discussion.

what do I need to finish?
I already made my point clear.
Gaga's singles flopped and even her most successful BTW single, which was a Madonna+TLC homage at best (her words, not mine), vastly underperformed compared to her previous fame+monster efforts.
To add Katy to this equation: she outsold most of Gaga's BTW singles and broke MJ's record.
So the answer to the question at hand: Whether Gaga can outdo Katy's iconic 6 #1s with #artpop2019? NO

[TheVoiceXtina]

Originally posted by sGabe4

pika taking ignorant monsters to school and then back home and giving them homework

!!!

[Mastamaind]

Originally posted by sGabe4

pika taking ignorant monsters to school and then back home and giving them homework

Just because you affirm it doesn't make it real dude.

[sGabe4]

Originally posted by Mastamaind

Just because you affirm it doesn't make it real dude.

just because you lack basic cognitive functions in your brain, barring you from understanding logical explanations, doesn't mean that unicorns are not real

[pika]

Originally posted by MrPeanut

I addressed the topic at hand (fyi: Gaga tying/not tying Katy's Hot 100 record) in my post. Why you care so much what I discuss in addition to that when you didn't even make the thread is beyond me, but it's good to see people being passionate about something these days, I guess.

I actually don't care what you think, you replied to me first so I replied back. But if you're gonna veer off topic, at least keep your arguments in the playing field. Because as far as I'm concerned, touring never determined how well a single does on the charts.

Originally posted by Mastamaind

Laugh all you want but in this thread y'all guys are bragging about how superior Katy is for her #1s record still in the same year when she got it Gaga made more money than her with her "flop" singles.

I guess she's bad and you're mad.

Mad that my fave continues to get bigger every era while yours does not?
Mad that my fave has her name written down in history for being the only female to get 5 #1s from one album? A record that legends like Mariah Carey weren't even able to achieve?
Mad that my fave only made $6 million less then yours when she had a 5 month old album by the time 2011 rolled around?
Mad that you aren't touching a penny of Gaga's $52 million networth yet you continue to cling to it for your life?

So mad, so so mad.

[Mastamaind]

Originally posted by sGabe4

just because you lack basic cognitive functions in your brain, barring you from understanding logical explanations, doesn't mean that unicorns are not real

You're insulting me, are you aware of that? Right? Then people say Gaga's fans are evil and stuff.

Anyway, to further explain my point.

Why does it matter that Katy got all those #1s when at the end of the day she made less money than Gaga in the same year with the "flop" singles? It's like they put you on a "high rank" in your job yet someone of a "lower rank" (as you guys try to make it like with Gaga and Katy) makes more money than you.

No need to add more.

[Nɑɑji.. ©]

No, why would she?

[MrPeanut]

Originally posted by pika

I actually don't care what you think, you replied to me first so I replied back. But if you're gonna veer off topic, at least keep your arguments in the playing field. Because as far as I'm concerned, touring never determined how well a single does on the charts.

You said touring isn't relevant to the "charts" (plural), even though there's a chart for touring, so what other charts beside the Hot 100 were you referring to? UWC?

[sGabe4]

how is that an insult? grow a pear
you and I both know that Katy probably made much more from actually selling her music than Gaga
since chart success and single sales are very closely related, this cannot even be argued about

[pika]

Originally posted by MrPeanut

You said touring isn't relevant to the "charts" (plural), even though there's a chart for touring, so what other charts beside the Hot 100 were you referring to? UWC?

Rewording and taking things I said out of context isn't really playing fair, is it? Clearly I'm talking about the Hot 100 since this thread is about the Hot 100. Tons of people refer to it as the "charts". You're on a pop music forum, you should know this. Abuse that argument that tours have a chart, though. Congratulations?

[Mastamaind]

Originally posted by pika

I actually don't care what you think, you replied to me first so I replied back. But if you're gonna veer off topic, at least keep your arguments in the playing field. Because as far as I'm concerned, touring never determined how well a single does on the charts.



Mad that my fave continues to get bigger every era while yours does not?
Mad that my fave has her name written down in history for being the only female to get 5 #1s from one album? A record that legends like Mariah Carey weren't even able to achieve?
Mad that my fave only made $6 million less then yours when she had a 5 month old album by the time 2011 rolled around?
Mad that you aren't touching a penny of Gaga's $52 million networth yet you continue to cling to it for your life?

So mad, so so mad.

LOL

Do you even know me?



Gaga's plays are low 'cause I started scrobbling a couple of months ago and they not include my plays during pretty much none of the eras.

Rihanna and Gaga are the queens of the pop world. And I'm not insecure about none of both.

[MrPeanut]

Originally posted by pika

Clearly I'm talking about the Hot 100 since this thread is about the Hot 100. Tons of people refer to the Hot 100 as the "charts'. You're on a pop music forum, you should know this. Abuse that argument that tours have a chart, though. Congratulations?

No, actually, I can't say that I've ever seen someone on here mistakenly refer to the singular Hot 100 chart as "the charts" (as in not just one), but I guess you see something new every day.

[H-I-M]

Originally posted by pika

So what I'm getting is Gaga stans know she can't break Katy's record, and since they refuse to just say "no" and leave they have to be bring up touring, networth, ~globalness~ (even though the sales of the first 4 Teenage Dream singles in the US alone outsell the entire BTW era catalog globally), and a ton of other things the OP didn't ask to make themselves feel better.

Am I correct?

No you're not.
It all started when your friend sGabe4 went off topic with this post.

Originally posted by sGabe4

the GP begs to differ

http://www.celebuzz.com/britney-spea...e-queen-of-pop

Lady Gaga is rapidly approaching hasbeen status. Better get ready for the meltdowns.

Which is why Gaga fans brought tour receipts and album sales.

Originally posted by pika

"Fell off the face of the earth" is a figure of speech.

A hyperbole, yeah I know that. But you didn't just say "fell off the face of earth", you also added "the second week", which is why I gave you a few chartruns where you can clearly see it wasn't the case everywhere (France, Japan and UK being among the biggest markets)