|
Celeb News: 'Cheek to Cheek' - 64 Metascore
Member Since: 3/5/2014
Posts: 7,746
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Brando
lol I had to do this in Word:
First paragraph: 94 words
The rest of the article: 287 words
The thickness of stan goggles
|
So all together, 384 words... Less than 400 words for an album review... People write more than that defending their faves on here.
And don't talk about stan goggles unless you're trying to be purposely ironic.
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/3/2010
Posts: 50,276
|
Now girls, please be civil. Do not turn this thread into a steaming mess with only 1 review score in.
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/20/2011
Posts: 18,905
|
LORDe that Slant evisceration
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/18/2008
Posts: 60,607
|
[QUOTE ]It's the oldest trick in the book: Past-prime pop singer attempts to boost his or her relevance in the face of dwindling sales and hastily changing trends by commissioning the help of a hotter, more bankable artist. Tony Bennett and Lady Gaga's Cheek to Cheek is the latest product of such a collaboration— except I'm not referring to the octogenarian Bennett, who, after 60-plus years in the business, is selling more albums than ever before, but to Gaga, whose free-fall from the upper echelons of pop has been as precipitous as her rise was meteoric. [/QUOTE]
RUTHLESS
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 34,855
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Rivington Reject
Why am I not surprised that Brandon's crusty water heater-built cellulite-looking bottom-feeding ass is still posting 300 pages deep into a thread about a popstar IT's not even into that has supposedly "faded"?
|
The fact that you're so bothered by him when he's been nothing but civil and level-headed speaks VOLUMES to the insecurity you have surrounding your fave. It's really not that serious.
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/9/2004
Posts: 9,558
|
Stan culture will be the death of us all.
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 26,316
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Inception
Now girls, please be civil. Do not turn this thread into a steaming mess with only 1 review score in.
|
perched for the next negative review the mess it's gonna be
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 13,761
|
lmao @ our favourite baked potato's other articles:
http://www.slantmagazine.com/house/2...do-what-u-want
" ... since Lady G's social media diarrhea only served to highlight just how preoccupied she is with her own public image—or, at the very least, that she spends a little too much time Googling herself."
http://www.slantmagazine.com/house/2...ady-gaga-venus
"... but this latest copyright kerfuffle comes on the heels of two other Artpop songs, "Aura" and "Do What U Want," whose backing tracks have similarly dodgy origins. (The lesson Ms. Germanotta apparently learned from the fallout over her 2011 single "Born This Way" was to swipe from lesser-known artists.)"
http://www.slantmagazine.com/house/2...do-what-u-want
" But the extent of the "Dirrty" singer's chart success in the last five years has consisted entirely of duets or guest spots (Maroon 5's "Moves Like Jagger," Pitbull's "Feel This Moment," and most recently, A Great Big World's "Say Something"), and "Do What U Want" has thus far failed to crack the Top 10, so the collaboration seems, at least on paper, to be a potentially savvy move for both parties."
10 Ridiculous gifs of Lady Gaga performing live
"Earlier this week, MTV posted an oddly optimistic take on the underwhelming performance of Lady Gaga's new album, Artpop, which, though it debuted at #1 with a respectable 258,000 copies, not only scanned 75% less than 2011's Born This Way did in its first week, but posted smaller opening numbers than both Katy Perry's Prism and Miley Cyrus's Bangerz."
I mean, I'm not saying it would have received a good review otherwise, but do you really think we would have received anything other than this scathing sour cream from Slant's resident career reviewer
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/21/2011
Posts: 12,474
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Sazare
The fact that you're so bothered by him when he's been nothing but civil and level-headed speaks VOLUMES to the insecurity you have surrounding your fave. It's really not that serious.
|
Nicely said
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 8/26/2011
Posts: 27,690
|
Quote:
Originally posted by G.U.Y
What is that ? + please explain more in detail
|
If there's a terrible review, you report it to MC. I remember people doing the same when BTW the album was released the botched reviews were removed from MC
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 26,316
|
Quote:
Originally posted by bluth
lmao @ our favourite baked potato's other articles:
http://www.slantmagazine.com/house/2...do-what-u-want
" ... since Lady G's social media diarrhea only served to highlight just how preoccupied she is with her own public image—or, at the very least, that she spends a little too much time Googling herself."
http://www.slantmagazine.com/house/2...ady-gaga-venus
"... but this latest copyright kerfuffle comes on the heels of two other Artpop songs, "Aura" and "Do What U Want," whose backing tracks have similarly dodgy origins. (The lesson Ms. Germanotta apparently learned from the fallout over her 2011 single "Born This Way" was to swipe from lesser-known artists.)"
http://www.slantmagazine.com/house/2...do-what-u-want
" But the extent of the "Dirrty" singer's chart success in the last five years has consisted entirely of duets or guest spots (Maroon 5's "Moves Like Jagger," Pitbull's "Feel This Moment," and most recently, A Great Big World's "Say Something"), and "Do What U Want" has thus far failed to crack the Top 10, so the collaboration seems, at least on paper, to be a potentially savvy move for both parties."
10 Ridiculous gifs of Lady Gaga performing live
"Earlier this week, MTV posted an oddly optimistic take on the underwhelming performance of Lady Gaga's new album, Artpop, which, though it debuted at #1 with a respectable 258,000 copies, not only scanned 75% less than 2011's Born This Way did in its first week, but posted smaller opening numbers than both Katy Perry's Prism and Miley Cyrus's Bangerz."
I mean, I'm not saying it would have received a good review otherwise, but do you really think we would have received anything other than this scathing sour cream from Slant's resident career reviewer
|
that's what I'm saying. This person doesn't like Gaga at all It's clearly not a fair review
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/1/2012
Posts: 12,442
|
Get to work Little Monsters, you better EMAIL Metacritic right now!!
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 5,624
|
Quote:
Originally posted by bey0nce
They clearly critiqued both hers and Tony's voices, their vocals styles and the instrumentalists and gave their opinion on the article, which is what critics do.
|
Vocals ? so you are telling us that this paragraph is a critique for Gaga's vocals
It's the oldest trick in the book: Past-prime pop singer attempts to boost his or her relevance in the face of dwindling sales and hastily changing trends by commissioning the help of a hotter, more bankable artist. Tony Bennett and Lady Gaga's Cheek to Cheek is the latest product of such a collaboration—except I'm not referring to the octogenarian Bennett, who, after 60-plus years in the business, is selling more albums than ever before, but to Gaga, whose free-fall from the upper echelons of pop has been as precipitous as her rise was meteoric.
MESS
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 12,760
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Brando
|
All this over one 2-Star Review, Lorde knows how they'll react if she really gets dragged.
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/21/2011
Posts: 12,474
|
I am sure Critic to Critic will not be affected by this bump and will continue to slay.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/18/2013
Posts: 3,396
|
Please don't spread this article. We don't want this to turn into a media hype like it did with ARTPOP.
We don't want Cheek 2 Cheek to be called Cheek 2/5 Cheek
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/1/2014
Posts: 13,632
|
Quote:
Originally posted by bey0nce
I really have seen it all now, negative review =/= Bias!!!111
They clearly critiqued both hers and Tony's voices, their vocals styles and the instrumentalists and gave their opinion on the album in the article, which is what critics do.
If the article was complete 100% praise with no form of criticism would it be bias then?
|
NO.
The point is, the critics should critique "constructively" NOT "destructively".
Critics should not get personal. There is a way to drag in a "classy" & less catty manner if you're looking to "drag".
This is not the business.
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/26/2012
Posts: 9,236
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Dark Miracles
Get to work Little Monsters, you better EMAIL Metacritic right now!!
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 3,432
|
Quote:
Originally posted by bluth
lmao @ our favourite baked potato's other articles:
http://www.slantmagazine.com/house/2...do-what-u-want
" ... since Lady G's social media diarrhea only served to highlight just how preoccupied she is with her own public image—or, at the very least, that she spends a little too much time Googling herself."
http://www.slantmagazine.com/house/2...ady-gaga-venus
"... but this latest copyright kerfuffle comes on the heels of two other Artpop songs, "Aura" and "Do What U Want," whose backing tracks have similarly dodgy origins. (The lesson Ms. Germanotta apparently learned from the fallout over her 2011 single "Born This Way" was to swipe from lesser-known artists.)"
http://www.slantmagazine.com/house/2...do-what-u-want
" But the extent of the "Dirrty" singer's chart success in the last five years has consisted entirely of duets or guest spots (Maroon 5's "Moves Like Jagger," Pitbull's "Feel This Moment," and most recently, A Great Big World's "Say Something"), and "Do What U Want" has thus far failed to crack the Top 10, so the collaboration seems, at least on paper, to be a potentially savvy move for both parties."
10 Ridiculous gifs of Lady Gaga performing live
"Earlier this week, MTV posted an oddly optimistic take on the underwhelming performance of Lady Gaga's new album, Artpop, which, though it debuted at #1 with a respectable 258,000 copies, not only scanned 75% less than 2011's Born This Way did in its first week, but posted smaller opening numbers than both Katy Perry's Prism and Miley Cyrus's Bangerz."
I mean, I'm not saying it would have received a good review otherwise, but do you really think we would have received anything other than this scathing sour cream from Slant's resident career reviewer
|
Now wait... This bitch has got some issues!
Well that makes this review certified BS.
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/21/2012
Posts: 55,134
|
So slant does t use . I'll wait for EW and RS
|
|
|
|
|