David Frum, Republican talking head and former speechwriter for President G.W. Bush, shredded Donald Trump in an article last week and again live on NPR today during his visit to On Point with Tom Ashbrook. Predicting a Clinton victory in November, Frum states that Trump is "surely the most policy-ignorant major party nominee of modern times, or perhaps of any time."
Honestly, that remix of Hillary's laugh with "We came, we saw, and he died" would be one of my top played songs if it was on iTunes. I LOVE it!
Also, I found out from the guy my ex cheated on that he was going behind our backs and dating us at the same time without us knowing. And that remix perfectly sums up how I feel.
While superdelegates don't vote until the convention, there simply is no argument that Bernie, his camp, his supporters, or super delegates can say that will change the race.
1) Hillary WILL cross the majority pledged delegates.
2) She WILL be ahead in the popular vote unless he makes her unviable and wins 100% of the people who will vote in California.
3) He could win ALL of the remaining 7 contests, and still be short of 1 (29 for HRC, 28 for BS).
I'm not a fan of the man but Reagan would be VERY against the entire crux of Trump's campaign (xenophobia to the outside world and deporting immigrants/building a wall across Mexico).
"I believe in the idea of amnesty for those who have put down roots and lived here, even though sometime back they may have entered illegally."
"Rather than ... talking about putting up a fence, why don't we work out some recognition of our mutual problems [with Mexico], ... and make it possible for [Mexicans] to come here legally with a work permit."
"The United States and our neighbors, particularly our neighbor to the south, should have a better understanding and a better relationship than we've ever had."
I absolutely despise when they ask one candidate their opinion on something, but not the other. On the GOP side, they would ask Trump and Jeb one thing. Then Marco and Cruz another. Then throw something small in for Kasich and Paul. I think that may be one of the reasons they weren't able to take out Trump. It was never on the in depth issues. For example, had we had a debate like the NYT interviews with Hillary and Bernie on wall street, we wouldn't even be calling the nomination tonight but weeks ago.
I absolutely despise when they ask one candidate their opinion on something, but not the other. On the GOp side, they would ask Trump and Jeb one thing. Then Marco and Cruz another. Then throw something small in for Kasich and Paul. I think that may be one of the reasons they weren't able to take out Trump.
The Republicans need to make sure that they never again have seventeen people run for President tbh. That was just a disaster and it made it easy for Trump to stand out in the crowd. Also made for low energy Jeb! struggle to get noticed. It's just impossible to do a standard debate with that many people. It irks me when they do that on the Democrat side though.. ask Hillary something and then ask Bernie something completely different when he's prepared an answer and is going to be saying that answer anyway. O'Malley is ignored for thirty minutes. Rinse repeat.
The Republicans need to make sure that they never again have seventeen people run for President tbh. That was just a disaster and it made it easy for Trump to stand out in the crowd. Also made for low energy Jeb! struggle to get noticed. It's just impossible to do a standard debate with that many people. It irks me when they do that on the Democrat side though.. ask Hillary something and then ask Bernie something completely different when he's prepared an answer and is going to be saying that answer anyway. O'Malley is ignored for thirty minutes. Rinse repeat.
Looking back, I feel bad with what happened to O'Malley, I actually liked him. He just wasn't as good as Hillary in my view.