OMG at someone posting UMG having losses which means it's because of ARTPOP
I just can't ... people are you even going to school ?
And sometimes Profit is not even a proof for success. What's important is the money in the company as Liabilities and Cash, and not the Profit and Loss account
ARTPOP sold 2M and made UMG lose money, Imagine all the other releases that can't sell 100k WW
UMG is a Mother company of many labels. 1 product is completely irrelevant when it comes to the final Profit and Loss acount for UMG

The fact that they included Gaga in the article as the sole reason simply means
I M P A C T WITH capital letters and bolded and underlined. It also means that she was simply the SOLE reason for PROFIT all the previous years. . . let me repeat -
I M P A C T