Oh please, RITD was just as acclaimed as "Holecene." In any case, Adele could have still won those fair and square.
This article is exposing common knowledge. Anything that deals with voting for the majority would have anything to do with some level of bias.
Some of you Britney, Katy and such fans need to get over it and be happy with your faves' VMAs, which has an even bigger flawed system.
Nope Holocene should have won those, fair and square. I still mad King only won BNA and Best Alternative Album. and for the Katy thing, i did not need to get over it because i know she havent got a song that really deserve to be the best that year but i know she'll eventually get it so
Nope Holocene should have won those, fair and square. I still mad King only won BNA and Best Alternative Album. and for the Katy thing, i did not need to get over it because i know she havent got a song that really deserve to be the best that year but i know she'll eventually get it so
That's your opinion, but "Rolling in the Deep" winning the big categories was NOT some catastrophe. As a matter of fact, most industry insiders said that if she didn't win it would've been robbery. This is how MOST people felt. No one cares about individual feelings of hurt stans.
As shady as NARAs are, it's still the most credible awards show out there. Plus, why so bothered by award? Why the insecurities?
That article talks about nothing new. It's just surface level. I read a blog post by a past nominee that went into more details than that and actually done some exposing.
That's your opinion, but "Rolling in the Deep" winning the big categories was NOT some catastrophe. As a matter of fact, most industry insiders said that if she didn't win it would've been robbery. This is how MOST people felt. No one cares about individual feelings of hurt stans.
But i had industry insiders too that said Bon Iver should win those.. But well okay then.. Whatever help you sleeps at night bye..
How is this a sham? This is how any voting process works. Sometimes you agree with the winners and sometimes you don't. But ultimately the winner is decided by what the most people liked. That's perfectly fair.
At least they have a process for selection. Better than the VMA and AMA mess every year. I didn't read in his article of him quitting his participation in the Grammy process or trying to make changes for improvement. Just complain, complain.