Quote:
Originally posted by venuss
So, that's all you have to say?
When the wars on Europe ended almost all of that continent was destructed and guess who helped them? Yeah the good sis US. Did they helped because it was a good action? No. Historically the US was having economic troubles and that was the perfect situation to fix it. The US litterally did what they wanted with Europe because they provided them of EVERYTHING, they abused of their power.
The US went for their best economic moment while Europe was trying to resurrect from the ashes. So they gave money and products to Europe, that was the gold era for the US. When most of Europe made it trough the crisis and when somone countries declared bankruptcy, US' economy passed for it's worst moment. Millions of people lost their jobs and thousand of companies declared bankruptcy. Their whole system collapsed.
Basically the US passed for their best moment in their history. That is known as the crisis of the 30's.
That just show us how the US was so economically dependient from other countries.
Bye

|
If America really wanted to take advantage of the situation, we could have come in after and taken over. That would have probably been even more financially beneficial. America's generosity is always taken for granted. We don't
HAVE to help anyone or be the world's policemen. People get so pressed when America gets involved, but they never step up to the plate to solve world conflicts. Do you think the Syrian President would have given up his Bio weapons without our involvement? Thousands more Syrians would be dead right now, while countries like UK vote to not get involved and look the other way when atrocities happen. Disgraceful, tbh.