|
Poll: Should marijuana be legal?
View Poll Results: Should Marijuana be legal?
|
Yes.
|
|
98 |
71.53% |
No.
|
|
39 |
28.47% |
Member Since: 8/29/2011
Posts: 18,282
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Giacobbe
As a smoker of pot, I'd have to say the best option is to "turn a blind eye". I know here in Canada, if the police catch you with a joint they don't care, if you have huge amounts on you than you get charged with trafficking. But like, if it becomes legal and massed produced, companies will change it to make it addictive, put taxes on it, etc. I'd rather you be allowed to grow it on your own, similar to any other plant.
|
+1
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/15/2011
Posts: 1,877
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ashuduff
No.
The United States could take a thing or two from Singapore's hard stance against drugs and crime. Maybe it wouldn't be such a screwed up place to live in then.
|
Oh yeah, THAT'S the route we should go down.
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/15/2011
Posts: 1,877
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Ramcoro
Oh that hardly disputes my claim. Did you not see my post about businesses adding additives to pot once It's legal like tobacco?
Although I doubt pot will ever be dangerous enough (no matter how much additives or nicotine is added) to the point of it being able to OD after consuming large amounts in a short time like you can with alcohol. However, I am confident that after corporations add **** to it, moderate use of pot over long periods of time will be much worse than moderate use of alcohol over long periods of time. Much like how cigs are more dangerous compared to alcohol if used responsibly.
|
Not only did I see it, but I had already replied to it.
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 6/25/2011
Posts: 37,192
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Ramcoro
Tobacco doesn't require processing either Yet it still done.
Current dispensaries are only for medical marijuana. Hardly a test of what full force legalization would do.
|
But if medical quality is there, people will purchase it instead of products with added whatnot.
People don't WANT any added whatnot in their pot, and there's more legislation against that kind of thing today than when cigarettes first became a real industry.
I'm sorry, it's just not a valid reason to oppose the legalization of marijuana at all, this argument is pointless. It's a complete hypothetical.
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 6/25/2011
Posts: 37,192
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Giacobbe
As a smoker of pot, I'd have to say the best option is to "turn a blind eye". I know here in Canada, if the police catch you with a joint they don't care, if you have huge amounts on you than you get charged with trafficking. But like, if it becomes legal and massed produced, companies will change it to make it addictive, put taxes on it, etc. I'd rather you be allowed to grow it on your own, similar to any other plant.
As a citizen I would have to say yes. Mainly because in certain parts weed causes a lot of violence because of drug lords. Legalizing it would mean that we essentially eliminate that due to the fact that anybody could buy it, and always have a supply handy if needed.
Overall, I'd like a mix of both. You should be able to grow your own weed if you choose, or go to the store and buy it. Even if a law was passed that if you grew it, than you couldn't sell it, it wouldn't be that big of an issue for me.
|
I personally think the dispensary system should just go Nation-wide, and licenses should be easily available at your local doctor.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/19/2011
Posts: 8,761
|
YES.
I have never used marijuana and I don't think I ever will, but the government would be smart to legalize it (or at least lessen the severity of punishment).
It costs the government (and taxpayers) a LOT of money for all of those investigations and to jail those prosecuted. The money could be used for getting our economy back on track, creating jobs, etc., instead of investigating and arresting people for smoking a plant.
If legalized, it could also be taxed heavily to create more money to be used elsewhere. Sorry if any of this was already posted! I don't think the (few, if any) dangers in using marijuana outweigh the tremendous costs associated with fighting marijuana use.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/29/2011
Posts: 18,282
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Jameson Teqkilla
But if medical quality is there, people will purchase it instead of products with added whatnot.
People don't WANT any added whatnot in their pot, and there's more legislation against that kind of thing today than when cigarettes first became a real industry.
I'm sorry, it's just not a valid reason to oppose the legalization of marijuana at all, this argument is pointless. It's a complete hypothetical.
|
You are making the assumption that all people care about their health.
If that were true teenagers wouldn't start smoking cigs.
Additives on cigs isn't just something done in the past. The level of nicotine continue to rises.
Finally, major businesses that will likely add additives to it have will have a major advantage over small "healthy" businesses. The power to mass market their product and deceive the public.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/29/2011
Posts: 18,282
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Jameson Teqkilla
I personally think the dispensary system should just go Nation-wide, and licenses should be easily available at your local doctor.
|
That would be more decrimilization than legalization though. I'm not that against the former.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/29/2011
Posts: 18,282
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Husky
Not only did I see it, but I had already replied to it.
|
Oh and you agreed with me (kinda) right?
Or at the very least you saw where I was getting at.
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 6/25/2011
Posts: 37,192
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Ramcoro
You are making the assumption that all people care about their health.
If that were true teenagers wouldn't start smoking cigs.
Additives on cigs isn't just something done in the past. The level of nicotine continue to rises.
Finally, major businesses that will likely add additives to it have will have a major advantage over small "healthy" businesses. The power to mass market their product and deceive the public.
|
I guess I just have more faith in people than you.
I don't even think it's about health, it's just that people WANT weed. People who smoke weed are taught by fellow pot-smokers to watch out for **** that is laced with anything. There's no market for "weed with additives."
I dunno, I just don't think I, as a healthy, active, intelligent pot smoker who pays taxes, contributes to society, etc., should be punished for a victimless crime because some people are going to make dumb decisions about it.
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/21/2011
Posts: 735
|
Yes it should be legal so people could stop complaining about it.
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/5/2006
Posts: 9,829
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Husky
Oh yeah, THAT'S the route we should go down.
|
It isn't perfect but hey, low crime and no drugs make for safe streets.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/29/2011
Posts: 18,282
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Jameson Teqkilla
I guess I just have more faith in people than you.
I don't even think it's about health, it's just that people WANT weed. People who smoke weed are taught by fellow pot-smokers to watch out for **** that is laced with anything. There's no market for "weed with additives."
I dunno, I just don't think I, as a healthy, active, intelligent pot smoker who pays taxes, contributes to society, etc., should be punished for a victimless crime because some people are going to make dumb decisions about it.
|
"Pot smokers" aren't a group. They're just ordinary people. Like any other randomly selected group of people you'll get smart people, like you, that will think intelligently, but you'll also get the stupid people that will still smoke cigs despite all the info about it.
I agree with the second. No one should be sent to jail for smoking or possessing small amounts of pot. Just not logical.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/16/2011
Posts: 9,876
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/10/2009
Posts: 10,622
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/17/2011
Posts: 52,363
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/29/2011
Posts: 18,282
|
Quote:
Originally posted by castrobabytiger
99% of rappers say yes
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/25/2011
Posts: 10,337
|
The dangers of alcohol and tobacco abuse are not pro-weed arguments. They are anti alcohol and tobacco arguments. Leading an argument by comparing it to other dangerous drugs is counter-productive.
I don't like the idea of the legalization of recreational weed because it becomes too accessible. Can you imagine the influx of high people on the road, in shops, and on the street high out of their mind all day, every day? It would be comical, but not productive in the least.
I enjoy weed in a party setting, but I do believe there are dangers associated with giving society the opportunity to use this recreational drug all day, every day. There are real dangers associated with it and a number of circumstances could be disastrous.
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/15/2011
Posts: 1,877
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Ramcoro
Oh and you agreed with me (kinda) right?
Or at the very least you saw where I was getting at.
|
Yeah, I understood your point, and I think it's a valid one. I've heard that tobacco companies have factories or whatever already set up in anticipation for the day weed is legalized. Depending on the circumstances of its legalization, if tobacco starts controlling it, then it will probably get ****ed up. If, like Jameson says, it'll continue being distributed medically, then it should be just fine.
|
|
|
Member Since: 2/11/2008
Posts: 10,964
|
Y'all want marijuana legalized but not for the medicine purposes, so stop with that argument.
|
|
|
|
|