Quote:
Originally posted by ks_dollar
Yeah you would have a Taylor stan name.
As someone that was clearly very critical over putting her music on streaming services of course Taylor would have a powerful say over this entire thing.
It's so greedy, extra and narc.
|
Did you read the first part of my statement. It is most likely the labels doing this and not Taylor, but there are legal implications as well. I am not speaking about vines; I am speaking about copyright and trademark infringement in general which is illegal to begin with. Taylor actually does like some vine posts, but Universal is a major player in following up on copyright infringement and it is legal requirement. Don't go blaming Taylor; I am just presenting the legality of it! And with Taylor's big name, it is even more apparent when people will use her name for their own personal gain (and again, I am not just speaking about vines), and thereby dilute the brand. Blame Universal and a bunch of lawyers, why don't you! I am sure this is happening with other artists as well, however, since Tay Tay is the most exposed and popular, then it makes sense to crap on her?
