[EdgeOfAddiction]

Originally posted by MJ Boston

Jumping up and down in circles whilst being able to hit high notes >>>>>>Walking/standing still on stage not being able to hit even the smallest of notes

Part of being an impressive performer when you're a singer is having the ability to sing well live. But that's another discussion.

But no one I know belts high notes as they jump up and down. They have to stop to catch their breath before even jumping into the next verse.

It may seem like the strenuous movements done while singing gives P!nk an edge but she's usually just swinging or the contraption she's in does the movements for her when she's actually singing. Bey, on the other hand, is capable of convulsing around the stage while simultaneously delivering those notes. A little out of breath, but she still delivers.

>

[Underdogs]

Originally posted by Genocide

P!nk fans' logic apparently.

You're still here?
And you're still trying to convince that it's the Pink stans who care about the poll. Embarrassing.

[Braz]

Why do you guys need to do this on a daily basis? Pitching singer vs. singer just to feel good if your fave win and in the process talking down on everyone else??? More iconic this more impressive that. It gets really tiring tbh. I mean, if this same poll hadn't been done to death already, ok, but we get a new one every 4 days or so.

[Nippy'sReceipts]

P!nk is more impressive. She changes it up. B slays but she always does the same thing in her performances. It's so repetitive. Just hairtwirling and asshaking. The Superbowl performance is proof of this. She never switches up her style. Plus she usually sings in unison with the pre-record, she hardly sings without playback in concert.

[Schoolin' Life]

Plus she usually sings in unison with the pre-record , she hardly sings without playback in concert.

Now what kind of lie? Unison with backtrack? Usually? Receipts please

[Bríseis]

Pink.

Beyonce has no stage presence imo, her performances are repetitive and... how to say it... sterile:
-lacking in stimulating emotional or intellectual quality
- lacking inspiration, imagination, creativity and vitality

[Honey]

Beyoncé.

There's only so many times you can watch the same acrobatic performance.

[Honey]

Originally posted by Bríseis

-lacking in stimulating emotional or intellectual quality

So you basically called her dumb. What does this have to do with performing?

Originally posted by Bríseis

- lacking inspiration, imagination, creativity and vitality

You've clearly never watch I Am... Yours, I Am... Tour, or Live at Roseland.

Go away, troll.

[Miles Caulfield]

They're both really good,but Pink.

[Kade]

I've seen both live and both are incredible for different reasons. Pink has a slight edge

[Nippy'sReceipts]

Originally posted by Schoolin' Life

Now what kind of lie? Unison with backtrack? Usually? Receipts please

Every Love on Top performance she does it.
I Was Here at UN. You can clearly hear her singing in a low tone with the track
Inauguration
Almost all of the Single Ladies performances.

It's not like she lipsyncs she just sings along with her pre-record which makes sense. If she sang everything 100% live every concert, it would cause damage to her voice in the long-run. Her songs are more vocally grueling than Pink's. Pink doesnt make Listens, I Cares, Love on Tops

[KillaCham.]

Originally posted by Underdogs

Pink. More versatile + unpredictable. And never lip syncs. No contest, really.

[Mhs90]

Originally posted by Braz

Why do you guys need to do this on a daily basis? Pitching singer vs. singer just to feel good if your fave win and in the process talking down on everyone else??? More iconic this more impressive that. It gets really tiring tbh. I mean, if this same poll hadn't been done to death already, ok, but we get a new one every 4 days or so.

It's just annoying when the same threads are done and beaten to death.

[sd93]

I just love them both so much and they're clearly THE two best performers in the industry. Both amazing women, it's pathetic we all fight like this. (Literally feel like that "SHE DOESN'T EVEN GO HERE" girl)

[Havoc]

Originally posted by Nippy'sReceipts

P!nk is more impressive. She changes it up. B slays but she always does the same thing in her performances. It's so repetitive. Just hairtwirling and asshaking. The Superbowl performance is proof of this. She never switches up her style. Plus she usually sings in unison with the pre-record, she hardly sings without playback in concert.

Hardly sings without a backing track? Talk about a big exaggeration....

[Lasers]

We done this thread a million times...

[Bríseis]

Originally posted by Honey

So you basically called her dumb. What does this have to do with performing?



You've clearly never watch I Am... Yours, I Am... Tour, or Live at Roseland.

Go away, troll.

I copy pasted it from dictionary to better explain what I mean since English is not my first language, dear. And no, I havent called her dumb, you clearly havent noticed the word stimulating, oh well

And no, Im not really interested in her enough to watch every her performance, but what I have seen was just how I described it. My opinion.

[Genocide]

Originally posted by Bríseis

Pink.

Beyonce has no stage presence imo, her performances are repetitive and... how to say it... sterile:
-lacking in stimulating emotional or intellectual quality
- lacking inspiration, imagination, creativity and vitality

How are her performances STERILE?
definition:
free from living germs or microorganisms; aseptic: sterile surgical instruments.

And you basically called her performances stupid(@the underlined).

What kind of ****ed up post is this?

Originally posted by Underdogs

You're still here?
And you're still trying to convince that it's the Pink stans who care about the poll. Embarrassing.

Doesn't take that much, considering you said it yourself how much you guys care for the polls .

[Bríseis]

Originally posted by Genocide

How are her performances STERILE?
definition:
free from living germs or microorganisms; aseptic: sterile surgical instruments.

And you basically called her performances stupid(@the underlined).

What kind of ****ed up post is this?

That word has more than one meaning. And I included that one mostly because her performances failed to evoke emotions on my part, and, well, I cant say that they made me think about something.

[Genocide]

Originally posted by Bríseis

That word has more than one meaning. And I included that one mostly because her performances failed to evoke emotions on my part, and, well, I cant say that they made me think about something.

you didn't use it properly. With words that have multiple meanings of the English language(and I'm sure every other language as well), they aren't necessarily used in the way the definition says it

And you just discredited yourself. Performers are meant to entertain, not give you a well-thought-out performance that questions your intelligence and make you feel "emotions".


entertainer  
Use Entertainer in a sentence
en·ter·tain·er [en-ter-tey-ner] Show IPA
noun
1.
a singer, comedian, dancer, reciter, or the like, especially a professional one.
2.
a person who entertains; host: She was one of the capital's great entertainers.