Quote:
Originally posted by Nicole
No, it's definitely a jaw-dropper of an album cover, and the last thing you'd expect from a major pop album cover, but it's also hideously ugly. I'm sure its ugliness has put people off and hurt sales - it goes as far from accepted + expected notions of mainstream pop as possible. I always said that I appreciated the cover and I knew that it would end up being recognized BUT at the end of the day it's human to prefer beauty and she should have found a way to get a strong reaction without resorting to something so heinous.
|
What do you mean by ugly? ugly as in not pretty or just hideous? if it's the latter I disagree, in my opinion it's one of the coolest things Gaga's ever done and whoever worked on the cover did a great jon with its design.
The cover did get a strongly negative response but I feel like it was only coming from the fans who bought the album anyway. I'm sure everyone else liked it, at least I don't see why someone wouldn't unless they expected a "cute" pop cover from her
That's Lady Gaga's worst cover, tbh. The cover for "The Fame Monster" and even "The Fame" are much better. 
