Why are ya'll mad at the person that said Nicole seeing as Nicole is much better than the girls that are on top performing live besides Beyoncé?
One would think a contender for ultimate performer/singer would have supernova-esque success.
Somewhere. Anywhere.
Irrespective of "talent," (because that's objective) it's like comparing Beyoncé to Emily Busmante (????) which some magazine did a few months ago. It's an insult.
ESPECIALLY because that troll was saying that Herr is MORE of a singer/performer than Bey.
**** outta here with that ****. Call me when "she" fills Madison Square Garden.
Bey may be the performer of our generation since she SING and DANCEE and the same time. But when it comes to vocals alone, Christina ***** HARD on BEY. and YALL WILL DEAL.
In my opinion: Beyoncé=Michael Jackson because they can both sing and dance their asses off Xtina=Mariah Carey or Whitney Houston because she is the best singer of our generation Gaga=Madonna she is a great performer and like madonna she gets very attention for her "scandals" Rihannas=Janet Jackson Riri because i think she has a lot of power like Janet had
I swear, I don't know how NICOLE even got in this thread, and I won't figure out how.
Yes, she is. She sings great, dances wonderfully, and connects with her audience very well. She takes Michael, Diana, Donna, Whitney and Tina and wrap them up all into one performance. To say that she isn't the performer of our generation/era is absurd. I can't really think of any of her peers who can challenge her. Not to shade any of them, but most of them benefit from props. I think Pink is the only one who comes the closest. She is awesome live. She can sing well, dance decently and put on a great show as well.
Yes, she is. Christina may have a more powerful voice, but she can't perform like Beyoncé and Beyoncé is more consistent. Nicole is OK, but she can't compare to Beyoncé. I would put P!nk second to Beyoncé in performances.
I don't like her music, but her performances are flawless 
