[Reza]

Originally posted by Jenher

please this was the most anticipated album of the year

no

[Cap10Planet]

Originally posted by KRL

i know that's why I said at least 50%. but still, even if you bought it only because it was cheap, you still are interested in it, even a tiny bit right? that's what I was trying to say because people here act like Gaga's shoving that album down everyone's throat

They probably wouldn't have coughed up the $14.99 for it, but the 99 cents deal may have triggered them to see what's up. It's attracting buyers. Either way, iTunes and Amazon have two different demographics, so I bet iTunes wasn't affected much by it.

[Nɑɑji.. ©]

I don't remember them stopping Rihanna's 99 cent fiasco either? Oh, okay.

[Mister Martian]

Not trying to take anything away from Gaga, but Billboard should cap the CD prices that will count towards their charts. If there was one in place, Gaga would not be selling that CD for $1.

[DanceFreak]

Originally posted by uclaboi2003

no

The album shot up to number 1 in itunes in less than 2 hours. SIT THE **** DOWN

[DG1]

Buying her own albums. Chart rigging much?


LOL. jk

[MrPeanut]

Originally posted by Mister Martian

Not trying to take anything away from Gaga, but Billboard should cap the CD prices that will count towards their charts. If there was one in place, Gaga would not be selling that CD for $1.

There is a cap for how much revenue the label is seeing from each sale. I heard it had to be at least $4.

[Neptune]

Originally posted by Mister Martian

Not trying to take anything away from Gaga, but Billboard should cap the CD prices that will count towards their charts. If there was one in place, Gaga would not be selling that CD for $1.

Child, can you read or are you just running in here with your assumptions?

Gaga isn't selling the album for $1... AMAZON ARE! They are still paying Interscope $9 per album and making a loss to advertise their mp3 service.

[Wilkes]

Originally posted by Mister Martian

Not trying to take anything away from Gaga, but Billboard should cap the CD prices that will count towards their charts. If there was one in place, Amazon would not be selling that CD for $1.

.

[DG1]

Originally posted by Mister Martian

Not trying to take anything away from Gaga, but Billboard should cap the CD prices that will count towards their charts. If there was one in place, Gaga would not be selling that CD for $1.

She isn't selling her album for $1. Amazon bought it wholesale and they are the ones baring the loss... Mad cuz she outsold 276k in one day?

[Wilkes]

Originally posted by DG1

Buying her own albums. Chart rigging much?


LOL. jk

I think she gave them out for free.

[Win]

Which mean she's doing it in a cheap way? Now our fave doing the same ((Well sometimes)) yayyy

[Chrïs.]

Originally posted by uclaboi2003

no

I know, right?

[Neptune]

Originally posted by Chris101

I know, right?

She must be bribing all the people in those 19 countries who paid full price.

[Win]

Originally posted by DG1

Oh **** those heels

[Mavik]

Originally posted by BnPac

It's not her fault that's true. But that represent more than 1/4 of her sales.

Then again some people had the amazon deal and didn't even sell that much. So cool for her.

[Chrïs.]

Originally posted by winroute

Which mean she's doing it in a cheap way? Now our fave doing the same ((Well sometimes)) yayyy

Huh?

Originally posted by MonsterUK

She must be bribing all the people in those 19 countries who paid full price.

Actually 22/23, that image is cut.

[Reza]

Originally posted by DanceFreak

The album shot up to number 1 in itunes in less than 2 hours. SIT THE **** DOWN

[Gui Blackout]

Originally posted by DG1

Buying her own albums. Chart rigging much?


LOL. jk

Classy.

[Ryan]

She sold more in one outlet than some of my faves in multiple ones

Get that money Stefani!