Quote:
Originally posted by musicb_/
Inside Out as a FIRST single? It could be a 3rd - 4th single, but 1st single?
|
I think it needed to be the 1st single.
1. It's not a dance track. It would have halted all the negativity that Britney wasn't dancing like 2001ney. A hot video where Britney got to be the not that innocent, **** tease.
2. It's slower. The radio needs a slow song. Inside Out is 100% Britney -- but would have been 100% unexpected since everyone was assuming it would be some Dr. Luke/K$ reject dance track.
3. It's progressive, risky and safe all at once.....it dips into dubstep like Luke wanted while still being radio friendly....yet risky since it's not a dance track.
4. Nods to history --- "hit me one more time, it's so amazing", "you're the only one whose ever drove me crazy".....a great nod to Britney's previous work...something that they have been doing a lot of this era.
5. It very well could have gotten some urban support which would have given the song a cool lift.
Regardless of WHATEVER song they chose, it was going to debut #1. We were dying for new Britney -- and her initial iTunes sales would have propelled it.
However, Britney really needed to promote.
What Luke is to Fatale is what Star is to Loud 
It would have been so epic. 
