Quote:
Originally posted by Radio Phone
I can and will continue, and you will #deal because you have no case. The original subject was of Beyonce taking risks ON THE ALBUM, on IASF. Not something that revamps the whole industry. You kidding me? Get outta here. Nice effort, trying to steer the conversation in new direction, but #fail, because I will keep this thing on track. I said she went in new directions with the album, because *********what is a necessarily a RISK is subjective, and is not a view that is shared by all people, nor does is have to be**********, and THAT is a point that stands. Your opionion does not, and it never did. #StayReaching
|
Oh dear. Are you able to understand that retreading the paths of others does not constitute a risk? Capable of processing that morsel of information? You have yet again failed to give me an EXAMPLE of a risk in IASF. Let me give a defintion of a risk, because they are not subjective as you keep on whining like a child in your posts: A risk
is a danger. Give me an example of such a risk on IASF.
AN EXAMPLE
EXAMPLE
EXAMPLE
EXAMPLE
Did you miss it?
EXAMPLE, because otherwise you are just babbling on like a incomprehensible fool. But - wait a minute! - IASF has NO risks! It is an album aimed at expanding an audience, as I'm sure you know. Now, do you think your fave would be enough of an idiot to record songs that
risk (oh look, there we have that word!) alienating listeners, making a dangerous move musically, on an album aimed at expanding the audience? I don't think so!
Now type me another pathetic hash-tag-littered reply!
