| |
Celeb News: Lady Gaga Reaches 5 Million Twitter Followers
Member Since: 3/25/2009
Posts: 13,550
|
Quote:
Originally posted by MrDeeds
IK?
But everybody keeps talking about twitter.
|
Oh. I misunderstood 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/25/2001
Posts: 26,816
|
Quote:
Originally posted by MrDeeds
I dont why u guys pay so attention to twitter.
Facebook>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
|
She already owns Facebook....it's now time to own Twitter. 
1. Britney Spears - 5,594,882
2. Lady GaGa - 5,533,058
Only around 61,000 behind Brit!
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/15/2009
Posts: 2,121
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Anthony Kerty
I decided not to quote all the angry Gaga stans, so I'd like for all of you to read, huh? 
First: it's not only a Gaga thread. It's a "Twitter" thread, especially when filled with lies such as "Gaga is Twitter's Queen". Which she isn't.  Not "at this moment", anywayz.
My post wasn't meant to demonstrate "maturity" or whatever - and I don't see a single bit of "I'm better than you" there. If anything, yours and some other Gaga fans posts are like that. I was just expressing an opinion. As for that, I said 90%. Last time I checked, that's not 100%. So if the shoe fits, the joke is on you. For what matters, not even 0,00001% fans of Gaga are here. So, once again: if the shoe fits... 
Real charts are only Billboard charts? Ooookay. I obviously didn't mean that. But hey, people read what we wrote. But they see what they want. Just saying. 
On what concerns Madonna, you and others were saying she's bigger than Madonna ever was/is. Something that she NEVER will be. "Next Madonna"? There is no such thing, and also never will be. If I were you, I'd me more concerned for her to be "Lady Gaga". I guess when you start having a name for yourself instead of "oh, that's the next Madonna" or "the next Britney", then you're somebody. It's sad to see Gaga stans like *you* prefer and need to downsize someone like Madonna or Britney - or anyone else - in order to make Gaga more of a "phenomenon". I guess being in a certain stanbase's company during the last year has really left a bad mark on you guys.  |
1. Gaga is Twitter's Queen is a mere state of opinion, just as people will dub her Queen of Pop or Britney Queen of Pop. That will always be an opinion. I do not understand why you have beef with that title. My guess is that you're truly bothered by the Gaga someday surpassing Britney on twitter. Relax. It is simply twitter. If you're going to be sensitive toward the title, how about ragging on others who use the term for their favorites? Beyonce? Hell, even Natalia Kills was called that once some time ago!
2. Regarding your generalization of the fanbases - 90 percent is nearly the entire darn thing. That is still a very gross overgeneralization of the Gaga stan base, and again, that is unfair. I wouldn't venture to post anything so stupid as "90 percent of Britney stans are delusional" because unlike you, I know there's a fair amount of stinkers and matures fans in EVERY fan base, no exception. Gaga probably has her fair share, but unless you have compiled OFFICIAL statistics with research and data, you cannot tout her specific fanbase consisting of mostly stinkers.
Is "the shoe fits" really your only argument? Quite amusing...especially since other Gaga fans seem to have agreed with some of my posts...I suppose this means they're in that 90% of stans you allege!
3. I have NO idea what you're talking about regarding Billboard. I don't recall posting anything related to that.
4. I don't feel that she's being downsized by being labeled the next madonna - in fact, it's a compliment. It's not saying she will BE Madonna, but will acquire the legendary status alongside Prince, MJ, etc. It's more about status. She will make a name for herself and be her own singer and hopefully be at the same status as Madonna someday. That's what it means, not that she'll be a clone of Madonna.
*sigh* More parting shots for Gaga stans. How sad...in a way I feel saddened for your favorite, having that kind of mentality.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/15/2009
Posts: 2,121
|
Sorry, little monsters, no more fighting!
Just had to sharpen those rhetorical skills in preparation for my Master's exam. :P
So...how do I make a twitter account?
|
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 11/24/2009
Posts: 61,404
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Delita_chan
Sorry, little monsters, no more fighting!
Just had to sharpen those rhetorical skills in preparation for my Master's exam. :P
So...how do I make a twitter account?
|
It's as simple as going to twitter and signing up. Takes 2 minutes.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/15/2009
Posts: 2,121
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Haus_of_Nicole
It's as simple as going to twitter and signing up. Takes 2 minutes.
|
Saw that. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/14/2008
Posts: 14,986
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Delita_chan
4. I don't feel that she's being downsized by being labeled the next madonna - in fact, it's a compliment. It's not saying she will BE Madonna, but will acquire the legendary status alongside Prince, MJ, etc. It's more about status. She will make a name for herself and be her own singer and hopefully be at the same status as Madonna someday. That's what it means, not that she'll be a clone of Madonna.
|
The thing is, I've seen Lady GaGa stans saying she's going to be the next *MADONNA*, when Poker Face topped the #1 stop in Billboard's Hot 100. So, it's pretty right to say that Lady GaGa's fans LOVE to exaggerate with her success. Whenever she does something CREATIVE (which in my head, it's more like freaky), they call it an achievement. If anything, we Britney stans talk real ****, not delusional futuristic ******** - not saying you do, but many of your co-stans do. Honestly, this whole thread is ********. So what if Lady GaGa topped Twitter? Just give her a soft clap and forget about it, don't mention it whenever you get into a stan war, or use it in regards of defending her when it comes to success discussions. It's nothing. And I'm not saying this because Britney is going to lose it, did you see ANY Britney stan mentioning her being the Queen of Twitter as an achievement? I don't think so. Personally, I swear I found out about it when a video about Britney passing the 5 million mark in there came out. It's that irrelevant. Don't make a pot party out of it.
WIZ LOVE AND NO HATE INTENDED.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/25/2009
Posts: 13,550
|
& while you keep bickering, the gap is now down to 50k 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/14/2008
Posts: 14,986
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Delita_chan
Nope, I don't recall the Britney the next Madonna either. Sure, she's great, she certainly is very widely successful and has longevity. But she's not a pop cultural force, not in the sense of Prince, Madonna (to quote another article).
|
I just saw this. 
Have you been under a rock for the past 11 years? Seriously, I'm starting to believe you haven't even heard of Britney, you claim you've been around longer than I have, I'm done here.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/15/2009
Posts: 2,121
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Louie
I just saw this. I'm done here.
|
Ah, there is a God.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/25/2001
Posts: 26,816
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Aliens & Rainbows
She already owns Facebook....it's now time to own Twitter.
1. Britney Spears - 5,594,882
2. Lady GaGa - 5,533,058
Only around 61,000 behind Brit! |
1. Britney Spears - 5,603,400 (+8,518)
2. Lady GaGa - 5,551,737 (+18,679)
GaGa is increasing at a much faster rate!  Over a +10,000 gain on Brit. The queens are owning Twitter. 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/15/2009
Posts: 2,121
|
So even *IF* she has people making multiple accounts, that's an AWFUL LOT OF PEOPLE making multiple accounts. We're not talking a group of 10 kids, we're talkin' lots!
I'm sure actually that there are people making fake accounts, but then again, the same goes for any artist.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/4/2010
Posts: 38,919
|
Britney stans get furious when people make threads about pointless accomplishments, yet they seem to praise and hail anything Brit does these days as an accomplishment.
How interesting.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/25/2001
Posts: 26,816
|
1. Britney Spears - 5,609,190 (+5,790)
2. Lady GaGa - 5,571,160 (+19,423)
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/20/2010
Posts: 15,376
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Aliens & Rainbows
1. Britney Spears - 5,609,190 (+5,790)
2. Lady GaGa - 5,571,160 (+19,423)
|
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/14/2008
Posts: 14,986
|
Can you please post Ashton's increase, like someone earlier said he's going to pass Britney too. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/20/2010
Posts: 15,376
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Louie
Can you please post Ashton's increase, like someone earlier said he's going to pass Britney too. Thanks.
|
July 19
1. Britney Spears - 5,360,015
2. Ashton Kutcher - 5,278,269
3. Lady GaGa - 5,000,010
Now
1. Britney Spears - 5,609,725 (+249,710)
2. Lady Gaga - 5,572,462 (+572,452)
3. Ashton Kutcher - 5,511,095 (+232,826)
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/30/2008
Posts: 8,146
|
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/20/2010
Posts: 15,376
|
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/25/2001
Posts: 26,816
|
1. Britney Spears - 5,624,544 (+14,819)
2. Lady GaGa - 5,597,738 (+25,276)
Only 26,807 followers from becoming the official Queen of Social Networking  
|
|
|
|
|
|
