A recount is not going to make tens of thousands of votes magically appear in 3 separate states. The fact that people think there would be fraud in the very states she needs to win which weren't even considered swing states is ridiculous
There's plenty of verified evidence of widespread Russian hacking and interference before the election. The Russian government was clearly intent on swaying the US election, why exactly are you so sure they would stop there?
MI uses paper votes. PA and WI use machines that are not hooked to the internet and are unhackable
I'm pretty sure the data scientists, demographers, and computer scientists who recommended the recount/audit knew this, yet they still claim that voter fraud may have occurred
Yup, they need an audit. I think Stein said she's aiming for both (at least in Wisconsin). With Team Hill joining they're definitely getting one there.
If she gets the coins I think she'll try both in MI/PA as well.
Yup, they need an audit. I think Stein said she's aiming for both (at least in Wisconsin). With Team Hill joining they're definitely getting one there.
If she gets the coins I think she'll try both in MI/PA as well.
The Democrats, when they incorrectly thought they were going to win, asked that the election night tabulation be accepted. Not so anymore!
Hillary Clinton conceded the election when she called me just prior to the victory speech and after the results were in. Nothing will change
Hillary's debate answer on delay: "That is horrifying. That is not the way our democracy works. Been around for 240 years. We've had free --
and fair elections. We've accepted the outcomes when we may not have liked them, and that is what must be expected of anyone standing on a -
during a general election. I, for one, am appalled that somebody that is the nominee of one of our two major parties would take that kind --
of position." Then, separately she stated, "He said something truly horrifying ... he refused to say that he would respect the results of --
this election. That is a direct threat to our democracy." She then said, "We have to accept the results and look to the future, Donald --
Trump is going to be our President. We owe him an open mind and the chance to lead." So much time and money will be spent - same result! Sad
In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally
In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally
states instead of the 15 states that I visited. I would have won even more easily and convincingly (but smaller states are forgotten)!
Serious voter fraud in Virginia, New Hampshire and California - so why isn't the media reporting on this? Serious bias - big problem!
Loves it! This is exactly what we should keep doing to him during his entire 4 years. Here's hoping fraud gets exposed in at least one state so that we can delegitimize him and mock him for his popular vote loss during his entire term. It so gets under his skin.
The post-truth movement will feed right into an authoritarian dictatorship. Period.
NPR did an interview with a guy who runs a fake news empire.
Quote:
When did you notice that fake news does best with Trump supporters?
Well, this isn't just a Trump-supporter problem. This is a right-wing issue. Sarah Palin's famous blasting of the lamestream media is kind of record and testament to the rise of these kinds of people. The post-fact era is what I would refer to it as. This isn't something that started with Trump. This is something that's been in the works for a while. His whole campaign was this thing of discrediting mainstream media sources, which is one of those dog whistles to his supporters. When we were coming up with headlines it's always kind of about the red meat. Trump really got into the red meat. He knew who his base was. He knew how to feed them a constant diet of this red meat.
We've tried to do similar things to liberals. It just has never worked, it never takes off. You'll get debunked within the first two comments and then the whole thing just kind of fizzles out.
He wouldn't give exact figures, but he says stories about other fake-news proprietors making between $10,000 and $30,000 a month apply to him. Coler fits into a pattern of other faux news sites that make good money, especially by targeting Trump supporters.
Let's help ha get a national recount 
