[FBF]

Originally posted by rihannafan

That isn't true. An opinion is infallible.

What ?

[L.B GAGA]

Originally posted by Communion

People of color have just as much agency to be classist as white people.

Capitalism is a disease of the mind.

Agreed sis, they'll bash you. yet that so called mac analogy is insulting, as it was built through the suffering of others,yeah but who cares,they'll say(psychopathic traits,numbed masses feeding on the elites(top 1%'s propaganda).

Globalization wont truly reach, till new systems are formed by the whole world to include all, if we want to avoid wars and hatred.
All we have currently is imperialism-capitalism being disguised as globalization and already equal,that's what communism was also.

[T.C]

Originally posted by rihannafan

How is that an assumption? If you're going to vote for someone, you should know who you're voting for. What are you defending exactly?

Why were Angel neo-liberal Hillary supporters trying to support rape of the new First Lady?

Why are they assaulting people including children around the country?

Why has Hillary not said anything to discourage it?

[Sunshine.]

This can be considered self-defense in light of the anti-black policies Trump plans to implement.

[FBF]

Originally posted by Communion

So you rather indict the poor worker in their consumption of basic technologies often required in seeking and tackling upward mobility (computer literacy etc. is often one of the basic skills required in any degree-requiring office job) and blame them for the way crony capitalism has raped, colonized, and exploited the lands and people in foreign markets? Instead of.. just blaming the crony capitalists themselves?

In your views, the poor American is just as at fault for the exploitation of foreign workers as the billionaire crooked capitalists (ironically literally Donald Trump) doing the exploiting is?

It feels like you have a lot of built-up anger, bitterness & hatred of the poor you need to work through.

Who did I blamed ?

[Lord Blackout]

Originally posted by Idontcareaboutyou

If those circumstances are being physically assaulted, then no. You are entitled not to be attacked for expressing an opinion.

Nope sweetie. They have the right to beat you up as long as they go to jail. Beating people without going to jail is being above the law. Beating people then going to jail is paying the price for your misdemeanor. If you support an ideology that'd get millions of peaceful undocumented immigrants out then it's safe to say you're doing worse than inflicting temporary damage on someone.

[rihannafan]

Originally posted by T.C

Why were Angel neo-liberal Hillary supporters trying to support rape of the new First Lady?

Why are they assaulting people including children around the country?

Why has Hillary not said anything to discourage it?

Hillary never supported rape. Therefore, voting for her does not bear any implications on your opinion on rape. Not a very hard concept to grasp,

[FBF]

Originally posted by L.B GAGA

Agreed sis, they'll bash you. yet that so called mac analogy is insulting, as it was built through the suffering of others,yeah but who cares,they'll say(psychopathic traits,numbed masses feeding on the elites(top 1%'s propaganda).

Globalization wont truly reach, till new systems are formed by the whole world to include all, if we want to avoid wars and hatred.
All we have currently is imperialism-capitalism being disguised as globalization and already equal,that's what communism was also.

Which was my point

[Idontcareaboutyou]

Originally posted by rihannafan

That isn't true. An opinion is infallible.

That is totally wrong. Most opinions are completely subjective, open to criticism and far from infallible.

[Shizuka]

Originally posted by T.C

So by this logic, applying your generalisation, all her supporters SHOULD be angels right? They are not. This means that your generalisation of Trumps fans are most likely off too.

So what you're saying is you're reaching to make generalizations to combat other generalizations to disprove them?

The generalized quality on one group that another opposes the qualities of, doesn't mean the opposing group should be the complete morale opposite at all.

Speaking in extremes back like that is so flat.

[rihannafan]

Originally posted by Idontcareaboutyou

That is totally wrong. Most opinions are completely subjective, open to criticism and far from infallible.

If they are completely subjective then how can they be wrong. An opinion can be countered by an opposing opinion. And neither will be wrong. An ideology can be wrong because of that certain things that is called ethics. There are courses that teach it, try them.

[FBF]

Originally posted by rihannafan

If they are completely subjective then how can they be wrong. An opinion can be countered by an opposing opinion. And neither will be wrong. An ideology can be wrong because of that certain things that is called ethics. There are courses that teach it, try them.

So you're assuming an opinion can't be unethical ?

[Idontcareaboutyou]

Originally posted by Lord Blackout

Nope sweetie. They have the right to beat you up as long as they go to jail. Beating people without going to jail is being above the law. Beating people then going to jail is paying the price for your misdemeanor. If you support an ideology that'd get millions of peaceful undocumented immigrants out then it's safe to say you're doing worse than inflicting temporary damage on someone.

That's a bit of a stretch. That would be like saying that killing someone is a right so long as you go to jail or suffer from the death penality afterwards.

Undocuments immigrants broke the law by coming in the country. Nothing wrong with having them out of the country imo. Dura lex, sed lex.

[cloudinthesky]

Good They are disgusting creatures for what they did to that poor man (even if I would totally let the one on the far right have his way with me).

Hopefully this kind of swift action will extend to everyone else that has been committing hate crimes recently as well. There have been way too many on both sides.

[rihannafan]

Originally posted by FBF

So you're assuming an opinion can't be unethical ?

An opinion is subjective, and therefore it can't be objectively wrong. Bigotry is objectively wrong and therefore it's not an opinion.

[slw84]

Originally posted by Sunshine.

This can be considered self-defense in light of the anti-black policies Trump plans to implement.

Which ones and please quote the verbiage please?

[T.C]

Originally posted by rihannafan

Hillary never supported rape. Therefore, voting for her does not bear any implications on your opinion on rape. Not a very hard concept to grasp,

Thanks for proving that generalising an entire voting base is stupid.

[Tropez]

Originally posted by Communion

Laws are invented by people who benefit from them.

As long as America allows the fascist white supremacist to take office, his supporters should be met with backlash as people fight for their freedoms, liberties and rights.

Hell no, no way, no fascist USA
No Trump, no way, no racist KKK

Down with the fascists and the nazis who support them.

Fight intolerance with intolerance. Very smart indeed.

[loveless]

Originally posted by rihannafan

How is that an assumption? If you're going to vote for someone, you should know who you're voting for. What are you defending exactly?

Exactly, they should have known, that doesn't necessarily mean they did know, which was my point. You implied that everybody who voted for Trump knew everything about him ahead of time, though they should have, many didn't. Therefore, all Trump supporters aren't the racist, homophobic, misogynist you claim Trump is; they aren't just like Trump.

[Lord Blackout]

And the irony of slw using the superpredator line when he's anti-Black lives matter

How can you think superpredator is a racist term unless you agree that the justice system is biased against black people? Selective much?