Quote:
Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf
Even if Russia did hack, you're implying he did this to help Trump, but there are no evidence of Trump-Russia ties, which is the point. You're accusing him of his bias based on evidence we don't know exists.
|
Let's review some facts:
- His advisors have strong ties to the kremlin
-His former campaign manager resigned after being exposed for ties to corruption in Russia/Ukraine
- Donald lied about not ever meeting Putin (Truth is they met on the set of 60 Minutes)
- His talking points mirror the talking points of the Kremlin
- He always sides with the kremlin vs the U.S
- His son said in 2011 that money pours into the Trump org from Russia
- He wants to weaken or abolish Nato (Russia's wildest dream)
- He refuses to acknowledge that Russia is interfering in our election despite the 17 independent and government intelligence committees that provided evidence that was presented to him during his classified breefings.
So all of this amounts to nothing for you yet you're willing to believe any article that sheds a negative light on Hillary. Pretty impressive for an unbiased poster who just happened to be an Ann Coulter avatar sporting fan at some point.