Quote:
Originally posted by dman4life
I'm seriously upset at how MTV had her perform right after Beyonce tho like seriously? It seemed like sabotage. First 2011 and now this? MTV has played Britney one too many times in her career and she should pay them dust from now on tbh. Let them continue to kiss Beyonce's ass. Even Rihanna was overshadowed on her night. I love Bey and love her performances but 15 minutes was a little much for an award show that wasn't even supposed to be centered around her. Sorry Army for ranting , Britney was great but the whole situation just doesn't sit well with me
|
Award shows are a game.
Do you honestly think this didn't happen in 2011 as well?
the tea was already spilled about MTV giving Beyonce what she wanted.
Do you think she didn't ensure she wasn't going to perform after britney?
She knew that Rihanna would perform multiple times but MTv knew what they were doing in 2011 and they knew in 2016.
Britney pre 2003 would have never been put in that situation but then again that was a different MTV crew
MTV as a whole has gone down the drain and you have more people in their with their own agendas.
It's done to highlight certain people with their extended speeches, performances etc that wouldn't get the same attention if they had the same treatment as any regular big star.
Britney got her vanguard, she got a performance that was better than leaving on 2007's
Britney probably won't perform at the VMAs anymore in the same way Madonna won't etc.
Many people were calling out MTV (industry people) for those shady ways.
Don't think that wasn't an agreement in place to make that happen.
Don't be bothered. The performances of 2016 VMAs were not iconic and will be forgotten next week.
Britney's legacy continues. her single got great exposure and finally a performance promo and others just have to do extra to get their attention
Just be grateful, Britney just doesn't need to do all of that...she just does her thing.
Kudos to Britney
Many of you all wanted her to do something "controversial"
It would have not looked well had she done that.
Not addressing the cheap production and the bad lipping, she did her thing and the GP is going to think she did a good job
I mean they couldn't even get a majority negative review though some publications tried. There were still quite a few positive reviews.
I want her to do AMAs and BBMAs