[Shaner69]

Originally posted by Aguilegend

The numerous media outlets saying it was flat and terrible

They gave Beyoncé a 15 minute time slot with songs nobody knows then threw Britney on stage for less the two minutes as her follow up it seemed like sabotage

[ymcmb]

her single is #2 on iTunes. reviews are mostly positive. mixed at worst. at least she can still perform at the VMAs unlike some other girls!

[Bimbo]

Originally posted by Shaner69

They gave Beyoncé a 15 minute time slot with songs nobody knows then threw Britney on stage for less the two minutes as her follow up it seemed like sabotage

2 minutes were enough for her to get dragged by the world. Why would you want the humilliation to last 10 more?

[Same Ol' Mistakes]

Yes. It wasn't a good performance but she looked so good and confident and the performance overall was an improvement of 2007-2014

[DouglasBooth]

no because she is getting bad reviews because her performance was bad

[jomarr]

Originally posted by Aguilegend

This doesn't seem to be happening either given Glory's sales and her show's declining ticket sales.

100K opening week is low for you? You have such high standards considering YOUR circumstances.

[Same Ol' Mistakes]

Yes. It wasn't a good performance but she looked so good and confident and the performance overall was an improvement of 2007-2014.

[TMRA]

Of course. She wasn't that bad. Remember her performances during Femme Fatale era, she didn't move, she looked like a robot. Now she is wasy more relaxed and she actually has fun on stage.
I don't know what's wrong with people

[Aguilegend]

Originally posted by Bimbo

2 minutes were enough for her to get dragged by the world. Why would you want the humilliation to last 10 more?

Omg

[♚ PRiNCE HiGH ♚]

She could've done SO MUCH better so I def see where the backlash is coming from ESPECIALLY after all that hype, TV ad, billboards.

It just wasn't the night to make a comeback

[EtherealCat]

Not really, its her own fault for doing some lacklustre dancing and then standing around lip synching.

[Brinny Baby]

Originally posted by jomarr

100K opening week is low for you? You have such high standards considering YOUR circumstances.

omg

[Aguilegend]

Originally posted by DouglasBooth

no because she is getting bad reviews because her performance was bad

Her performances have been terrible for a while though (I like her, but no shade) so I don't see why people are up in arms all of a sudden.

[Bounce]

Originally posted by Instinct

There have been like 3 negative reviews. The other reviews have been overwhelmingly positive. I guess people just hold Britney to such a high standard because of her VMA history

[Adonis]

The dancing and out of sync lipping was the worst part tbqh!!! It just seemed like she could barely move and she looked like she maybe didn't get enough sleep the night before.

The part where she tries it with G-Eazy who is barely 20 years old was cringey....

[Aguilegend]

Originally posted by Bounce

This is what I was talking about! Looks like it wasn't a comeback at all.

[Rick]

Do you feel bad that Xtina is completely forgotten?

[Bicassie]

Well....people have standards...unlike the army

[jomarr]

Originally posted by Bounce

The LA Times review was positive. They just pointed out that people were on their phones while Brit was performing

The second article was MTV's "unprofessionalism" making Beyonce and Britney back to back performances. They did say she did fine.

The third article is obviously positive

The last article was the same as the second one

Y'all are NUTS about saying anything **** about Britney

I bet if your fave went out and performed after BEYONCE y'all would be SHOOKED as well.

[Bie]

She is No.2 on iTunes and still climbing so I dont care. Her performance is good.