[Beautiful Liar]

Originally posted by Cupid

Your trolling is just tragic now.

Acting as if being gay and supporting Hillary is silly when Gays for Trump are literally insulting the entire community.

the typical "your trolling" whenever a FACT is posted, ya are so weak minded and in denial its getting pathetic

you probably haven't even looked up her Clinton Foundation donations don't come for me without fact checking my post, I have no reason to lie

Even Bernie Sanders AFTER the primary was over said accepting donations from Muslim countries is a problem because they oppressed women and LGBTQ.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vid...atorships.html



I have no reason to lie! But you do because your a bias mod!

[Giselle]

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf

Who? Please name these unqualified people you claim are all over the administration.

Former Social Secretary, Jeremy Bernard was a donor/fundraiser. So was Desiree Rogers. I'm not about to go through the White House staff to prove an obvious point, but read this if you'd like: http://foreignpolicy.com/2013/02/28/...e-white-house/

Donors getting jobs is common practice and isn't exclusive to the Clinton's. Sorry.

[Beautiful Liar]

Originally posted by Giselle

The Clinton Foundation does amazing work, most of which is not in/for the United States. That money is being used greatly to benefit people in the developing world, with women and girls being Hillary's top priority when she was at the foundation.

You don't know what you're talking about.

This is only half true because none of the charities benefit Women or LGBTQ in Muslim countires like Saudi Arabia for example who by way donated millions. The Developing countries your referring to are like Turkey, Georgia, Haiti, Guyana, etc

[Archetype]

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf

We already have proof she handed out one to someone who was not qualified to be on the board.

What does this have to do with the person being qualified or not? The person in this video is not the person discussed in these emails, who does in fact have the experience and credentials necessary to take on a government position. Yes, I unfortunately read through them. I don't give a **** if this person donated to the Clinton Foundation, as they obviously have the experience and recommendations provided in these emails necessary to take on such a job. As for the person in the video, that's not okay, and I have no idea why H or any of the people who work on the committee approved his appointment.

[hairofglory]

Corruption suddenly being ok Hillary's campaign its legacy

[Radiance]

I don't see why a charity should stop accepting money from countries because said countries have bad laws. To not accept the money would not change the situation in those countries, whilst accepting it would benefit the millions of people in Africa that are being saved by the Clinton Foundation.

[Giselle]

I mean, it depends on what you think is corruption. I don't actually think it's corruption and I think it's majorly blown out of proportion.

I really don't care.

[Hey Gurl Hey]

The self hatred from the LGBT people on here when it comes to the Clinton Foundation and Hillary's past anti gay support it's astounding that people still support her after all the dirt that's come to surface

[ShouldersSideways]

Originally posted by Radiance

I don't see why a charity should stop accepting money from countries because said countries have bad laws. To not accept the money would not change the situation in those countries, whilst accepting it would benefit the millions of people in Africa that are being saved by the Clinton Foundation.

Right?

What kind of argument would, "I won't take your millions of dollars unless you change your laws!" be?

[BlueTimberwolf]

Originally posted by Archetype

What does this have to do with the person being qualified or not? The person in this video is not the person discussed in these emails, who does in fact have the experience and credentials necessary to take on a government position. Yes, I unfortunately read through them. I don't give a **** if this person donated to the Clinton Foundation, as they obviously have the experience and recommendations provided in these emails necessary to take on such a job. As for the person in the video, that's not okay, and I have no idea why H or any of the people who work on the committee approved his appointment.

We dont know what their qualifications are, but if they had to beg in a secret email it was probably no different than the guy in the video.

[Archetype]

What is the point in even discussing this? Are these accusations supposed to make me want to vote for Trump, who actively does business with the very same people and countries that donated to the Clinton Foundation? At least the Clinton Foundation takes that money and puts it to good cause, rather than building real estate or failed airline and alcohol businesses. I get that Hillary has a tarnished record, but I'm willing to wager all of the good she has done over Trump, who literally profits from the money lost by US citizens at his casinos, which, by the way, are shutting down in NJ because they failed.

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf

We dont know what their qualifications are, but if they had to beg in a secret email it was probably no different than the guy in the video.

Are we talking about the very last email? In the email, the person's qualifications are briefly mentioned, and then Hillary responds by asking her aid what they can do for the candidate in question. The person seems qualified to me based on credentials required during the hiring process for government jobs. Forgive me if I missed something...

[BlueTimberwolf]

Originally posted by hairofglory

Corruption suddenly being ok Hillary's campaign its legacy

Right? This thread can go on for pages b/c Trump kicked a crying baby out of a venue but when you have proof of a govt official selling influence into a government that affects your daily life, putting people in positions of power that affect your safety, and it's #noonecares. Truly pathetic.

[Wonderland]

This is so ridiculous and the logic of some people is just...

So Trump can do business with these nations and profit from them (and won't get dragged) yet Hillary does for accepting donations?

[Wonderland]

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf

Right? This thread can go on for pages b/c Trump kicked a crying baby out of a venue but when you have proof of a govt official selling influence into a government that affects your daily life, putting people in positions of power that affect your safety, and it's #noonecares. Truly pathetic.

The real kii is believing that Trump wouldn't do the same thing if not worse if he had the chance.

[Akil]

Trump is a ****ing joke. As is anyone who supports him.

[Lebanese Dude]

Not Trump supporters trying to put Hillary down for corruption charges

The hypocrisy is just unreal. You can't berate Hillary for the things Trump does openly. You can't.

Then there's the implication that one can't take money from donors in some countries because apparently they have certain anti-gay sentiments. Why stop at LGBT rights? What about countries that are sketchy with women's rights? minority rights? worker's rights? children's rights?

At this rate, the only places that are "acceptable" to receive donations from are Canada, some parts of Western Europe, and the East Coast of the USA

[Jackson]

Honestly, I'd rather have a little corruption than someone that would destroy all foreign relations and deport half the country. In the end Hillary lives for the approval of the US and will do anything to get it. She wants the best for the country whether its for the right reasons or not. There's no legitimate reason someone would vote for Trump unless they're a rich straight white male, and even then they're ignoring a large portion of what his presidency will entail

[Butters]

Facts about Trump

He hasn't held a elected office, ever

Has little foreign policy expertise (see any interview where he stumbles over discussion on international issues and needs to be gently caught up)

Lies more frequently than Hillary (see politifact)

Has no plan to deal with overwhelming student loans

Against gun restrictions (I am for)

denies climate change and is against clean energy

He's shown again and again that he has a short temper and an impulse to lash out at whoever slights him. His supporters are nationalists and proud racists. He acts like a bully. Belittles anyone that opposes him

He's not a man that I would want representing my county in the international stage. Period.

Jk it's bc am just trend hopping w the sjw Twitter millennials

[Lebanese Dude]

Corruption will always be a part of politics. Puritan mentalities don't take you far.

The thing is people here don't even know what corruption is. They think any relationship between politicians is a sign of corruption.

Hillary has had to craft a giant web of connections in order to get things done. People try to claim it's corruption, when it's actually called networking. Clearly, when you have such a huge network, any action you take can be seen as a "favor" to someone you have ties with. They don't realize that a true statesman cooperates with everyone and only the best of them have the power to exchange "favors" (transactions is the better word) in order to later take concessions in the name of getting **** done because people are inherently selfish ****s that won't do something if it won't benefit them somehow.

[Jackson]

Far beyond the issues, no one with Trump's temperament and ego should EVER lead a country. Even if I agreed with him on every issue I wouldn't vote for him. Above all, the President is the face of the USA and I don't think we'd come out doing well with that kind of image. All he represents are the nationalist, racist, xenophobic, bigoted Americans that lurk online and suddenly have a platform to project their hate.