Bernie's endorsement might actually hurt Hillary's standing amongst older (and reliable) voters who still see socialism and communism as the ultimate evil.
If Hillary loses older voters, you can kiss Florida goodbye.
I honestly don't see this being an issue. There needs to be unity in the party in order to defeat the Republicans. It's not like all of a sudden Hillary will become a Democratic Socialist just because Bernie endorsed her
Nate Cohn @Nate_Cohn 3m3 minutes ago Washington, DC
Clinton ahead by 11 points in San Francisco with all of the Election Day vote counted. She lost the Election Day vote there by 90 votes
On another note after seeing Retro post about Warren being Hillary's VP pick, I've been thinking about it. It would TOTALLY make sense. It's probably been planned before the campaign started which is why Warren didn't endorse Bernie in the MA primary even though he's in the progressive wing of the party. It's also probably why the other VP picks in talks like the Castro brother died down and Warren started campaigning against Trump.
I honestly don't see this being an issue. There needs to be unity in the party in order to defeat the Republicans. It's not like all of a sudden Hillary will become a Democratic Socialist just because Bernie endorsed her
You know damn well Trump will say "One crazy socialist, today endorsed a lying socialist. Not sure which is worse. Sad!"
On another note, we can look forward to the mess that will ensue in the upcoming days when Bernie releases or doesn't release his tax returns. Jeff Weaver was strong armed into saying Bernie would, so this will be a kii to look forward to.
I don't think the NA thing would bother most people that don't already dislike her - she's incredibly well liked, especially among young people. It's shocking, sure, and a bit problematic but I don't see it really gaining traction.
I don't think the NA thing would bother most people that don't already dislike her - she's incredibly well liked, especially among young people. It's shocking, sure, and a bit problematic but I don't see it really gaining traction.
It's only problematic if it can be proven false. It cannot. The evidence is scarce, but tends toward showing it as true.
