[Retro]

http://polling.reuters.com/#!poll/TM...ue/spotlight/1

v interesting

[RatedG²]

Wait so Akil or Retro fill me in, Warren looks most likely to be VP?

[Retro]

Originally posted by RatedG²

Wait so Akil or Retro fill me in, Warren looks most likely to be VP?

Apparently so, yes - Harry Reid an Marc Elias quietly researching the possibility as she attacks Trump, without considering anyone else, when Marc is the Clinton campaign's general counsel? It looks to be an extremely strong possibility right now, actually - and since Hillary likely is of the opinion that she's sealed the nomination, it perfectly matches the time at which she'd start vetting VP candidates. Obama started vetting immediately after becoming the presumptive nominee and it looks like Hill will follow suit.

[Bloo]

I will ****ing sob of joy if we get a Clinton-Warren ticket and if they win in November. I would be SOOOOOOOOOOOOO happy....

[rivers]

Originally posted by Skywalker

Harry Reid is quietly promoting Elizabeth Warren as a top pick to be Hillary Clinton’s running mate, and the Senate minority leader is already looking into Massachusetts law to see how quickly her Senate seat could be filled if Warren does ascend to the vice presidency, a source close to him said Friday.

Reid views Warren as someone who can unite the Democratic Party after the longer-than-expected primary battle between Clinton and Bernie Sanders, the source said. The person confirmed a Boston Globe story that reported Reid was actively researching the state’s special election rules.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/0...esident-223892

This would be a dream come true

[Skywalker]

I have a feeling Warren going in on Trump the last month or so was a test to see how she'd be as an attack dog and potential VP. Seems she passed with flying colors.

[RatedG²]

Originally posted by Retro

Apparently so, yes - Harry Reid an Marc Elias quietly researching the possibility as she attacks Trump, without considering anyone else, when Marc is the Clinton campaign's general counsel? It looks to be an extremely strong possibility right now, actually - and since Hillary likely is of the opinion that she's sealed the nomination, it perfectly matches the time at which she'd start vetting VP candidates. Obama started vetting immediately after becoming the presumptive nominee and it looks like Hill will follow suit.

Is Hillary even interested in a two female ticket? Does she not think Warren's past criticisms won't be brought up?

And I hope she's considering only if she feels Warrej is best suited, not to please progressives. Because even progressives like SecularTalk and TYT said a VP like her will make them "possibly" vote for her. Annoying af

[Dessy Fenix]

Originally posted by Skywalker

Harry Reid is quietly promoting Elizabeth Warren as a top pick to be Hillary Clinton’s running mate, and the Senate minority leader is already looking into Massachusetts law to see how quickly her Senate seat could be filled if Warren does ascend to the vice presidency, a source close to him said Friday.

Reid views Warren as someone who can unite the Democratic Party after the longer-than-expected primary battle between Clinton and Bernie Sanders, the source said. The person confirmed a Boston Globe story that reported Reid was actively researching the state’s special election rules.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/0...esident-223892

Originally posted by Akil

Reid commissioned a review by Washington election law attorney Marc Elias (who is also the general counsel to the Clinton campaign, and has advised Warren on legal matters in the past). The review only focused on Massachusetts, and Reid did not conduct such a follow-up review on any other state, according to the person source close to Reid.

[Bloo]

Originally posted by RatedG²

Is Hillary even interested in a two female ticket? Does she not think Warren's past criticisms won't be brought up?

And I hope she's considering only if she feels Warrej is best suited, not to please progressives. Because even progressives like SecularTalk and TYT said a VP like her will make them "possibly" vote for her. Annoying af

Hillary's already stated she isn't against the idea of a dual female ticket.
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-s...t-602172995852

Also, Warren's criticisms from the past could easily be dismissed.

[Retro]

http://polling.reuters.com/#poll/TM6...ACE:1,LIKELY:1

Trump polling VERY low with whites compared to Romney. The same pollster shows him at 29 or so with Asians and "other" non-black non-Hispanic demographics, and even with Romney for black voters at just 6.1. Other polls suggest he'll get about 22 points with Hispanic voters.

With those demographics, assuming approximately the same turnout as 2012, the RCP map estimates...



TEXAS HOLY ****.

436 - 102 for Hillary, electorally.

[RatedG²]

I just don't see how someone so critical of her not too long ago can just serve right under her. Hmm

Someone so careful and calculating as her would have a hard time rationalizing an older female as VP when you have an older female at the top of a ticket. I just don't see it but if it happens it happens. I don't like Warren (she's overrated as hell) but I also don't see any better candidates other than maybe Tim Kaine

[RatedG²]

Have fun with that Retro

[Akil]

Originally posted by Bloo

Hillary's already stated she isn't against the idea of a dual female ticket.
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-s...t-602172995852

Also, Warren's criticisms from the past could easily be dismissed.

Scott Brown tried that same tactic and failed miserably.

Pocahontas? Really?

[Retro]

Originally posted by RatedG²

Is Hillary even interested in a two female ticket? Does she not think Warren's past criticisms won't be brought up?

And I hope she's considering only if she feels Warrej is best suited, not to please progressives. Because even progressives like SecularTalk and TYT said a VP like her will make them "possibly" vote for her. Annoying af

She is, and Warren's prior criticisms have been comparatively very light. And let's not forget when she and the rest of the women in the Senate wrote that letter!

[Akil]

Not Texas.

[Retro]

TEXAS MOTHER****ERS IT'S IN PLAY I TOLD Y'ALL BE READY

Originally posted by RatedG²

I just don't see how someone so critical of her not too long ago can just serve right under her. Hmm

Someone so careful and calculating as her would have a hard time rationalizing an older female as VP when you have an older female at the top of a ticket. I just don't see it but if it happens it happens. I don't like Warren (she's overrated as hell) but I also don't see any better candidates other than maybe Tim Kaine

She really wasn't actually all that critical of her tho.

[Akil]

Originally posted by RatedG²

I just don't see how someone so critical of her not too long ago can just serve right under her. Hmm

Someone so careful and calculating as her would have a hard time rationalizing an older female as VP when you have an older female at the top of a ticket. I just don't see it but if it happens it happens. I don't like Warren (she's overrated as hell) but I also don't see any better candidates other than maybe Tim Kaine

-------------------------------------------
There is nothing exciting about Tim Kaine.

[Dessy Fenix]

Originally posted by Retro

http://polling.reuters.com/#poll/TM6...ACE:1,LIKELY:1

Trump polling VERY low with whites compared to Romney. The same pollster shows him at 29 or so with Asians and "other" non-black non-Hispanic demographics, and even with Romney for black voters at just 6.1. Other polls suggest he'll get about 22 points with Hispanic voters.

With those demographics, assuming approximately the same turnout as 2012, the RCP map estimates...



TEXAS HOLY ****.

436 - 102 for Hillary, electorally.

If only... If only

[Auris]

I think she needs a Texan male for her VP tick if she wants the most success. Not another yankee woman. Americans are sexist (esp the south)

[Retro]

Originally posted by Dessy Fenix

If only... If only

It can happen. We can FIGHT for this!