[Bloo]

Originally posted by MaRy

sis trump is above hillary already in nation polls? and it's only the beginning...

Polls this far out don't mean anything. Trump is uncontested. Hillary and Bernie are not. That's likely why their leads have dropped against Trump. However, GE polling during the primaries are not viable. There's no viable statistical model you can make to accurately and reliably predict that far out. There's too many variables and too many things can change.

[Crank_It_Up]

Sanders needs to gtfo. We all know he's not going to get that nomination, just drop out already! He's just making this a lot worse than necessary for the Democratic party as a whole, tbh.

[masegoRih]

Lest we forget that by this time in 2008 Obama was winning by only 1% in national polls

[RatedG²]

Bernie supports getting violent over what they thought, wrongly, was a breach of democracy

What else is new!

[brianc33616]

Originally posted by Bloo

I'll concede my entire post until you show me a third party president in the near 300 years of our country.

Perot received death threats in 1992 and briefly backed out. Had he stayed in he would've beaten both Clinton and Bush. I think you're intent on achieving self-fulfilling prophecies, and trying to prevent other Americans from thinking when voting in November.

I'm out though. Just because Clinton backers seem to dominate this thread doesn't make her any less evil of a candidate. I can't stand either her or Trump, so I don't think how her backers on here think they will intimidate me into supporting her by saying "but Trump will win!"

Both Clinton and Trump got the exact same failing score when I took I Side With, so I fear (nor want) neither presidency more than the other.

[brianc33616]

Originally posted by Retro

The Democratic Party is not evil and the tinfoil hat brigade that says they are have no more legitimate interest in American liberty and freedom than Democrats.

Democrats have no legitimate interest in American liberty and freedom to begin with. You're a riot!

[vuelve88]

Originally posted by brianc33616

Perot received death threats in 1992 and briefly backed out. Had he stayed in he would've beaten both Clinton and Bush.

No

[masegoRih]

Originally posted by Giselle

I mean, everyone loved this woman pre-campaign. She's taken a pretty heavy battering. I do think and hope she can rebuild her image as President.

You still don't get it..... People always hate her when she's campaigning to become something but praise her when she's not.

[RatedG²]

Not you leaving after I sourced you

[Reza]

Originally posted by Giselle

I mean, everyone loved this woman pre-campaign. She's taken a pretty heavy battering. I do think and hope she can rebuild her image as President.

What do you mean by rebuild her image? did she do anything to ruin it? She will do exactly what she's been doing. Talking about progress for all Americans regardless of where you come from, your sexual orientation or race as well as her economic, social and international policies. She doesn't have to rebuild anything.

[Bloo]

Originally posted by brianc33616

Perot received death threats in 1992 and briefly backed out. Had he stayed in he would've beaten both Clinton and Bush. I think you're intent on achieving self-fulfilling prophecies, and trying to prevent other Americans from thinking when voting in November.

I'm out though. Just because Clinton backers seem to dominate this thread doesn't make her any less evil of a candidate. I can't stand either her or Trump, so I don't think how her backers on here think they will intimidate me into supporting her by saying "but Trump will win!"

Both Clinton and Trump got the exact same failing score when I took I Side With, so I fear (nor want) neither presidency more than the other.

Glad you know everything that would have been in history. I should come to you for information since you're so enlightened.

And it's great you don't have a preference for Hillary or Trump. But I prefer Hillary over every other candidate. So I'll happily vote for her in November.

[Giselle]

Originally posted by masegoRih

You still don't get it..... People always hate her when she's campaigning to become something but praise her when she's not.

No, I do get it. But this feels different. A lot of the people that hate her now are relatively young and don't know all of the good she's done. A lot of them are just now getting familiar with her as the evil witch who's cheating Bernie.

[King Maxx]

Originally posted by masegoRih

Lest we forget that by this time in 2008 Obama was winning by only 1% in national polls

Obama was losing to Mitt Romney a week before the election and by like 5 percentage points.

The worrying and narrative that he is this unstoppable force is just so funny to me.

[RatedG²]

Umm Giselle is right. Her image is ****ed. Have you seen her unfavorables?


Clearly she needs to rebuild it. Giselle said nothing wrong

[Retro]

Originally posted by brianc33616

Democrats have no legitimate interest in American liberty and freedom to begin with. You're a riot!

I'm a part of the Democratic Party that gave us John Fitzgerald Kennedy, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Elizabeth Warren, Barack Obama, and now Hillary Rodham Clinton, to name a few stellar and high-profile warriors for progress and liberty.

Not sure which one you're talking about.

[MaRy]

Originally posted by Bloo

Polls this far out don't mean anything. Trump is uncontested. Hillary and Bernie are not. That's likely why their leads have dropped against Trump. However, GE polling during the primaries are not viable. There's no viable statistical model you can make to accurately and reliably predict that far out. There's too many variables and too many things can change.

i know but they even talk here in Canada about Hillary cheating in Nevada... her image has been tainted... Trump will have a field day tbh with both, he's too charismatic to lose his lead with white males...

[brianc33616]

Originally posted by vuelve88

No

Perot had as much as 40% support at one point. That's more than either Clinton or Bush. I'm sorry, as this thread is truly not about the US Election but simply for Clinton supporters to reassure each other and fight off anyone who invades their "safe space," even when the weight of the evidence and reality comes crumbling down on them.

[RatedG²]

Originally posted by brianc33616

Perot had as much as 40% support at one point. That's more than either Clinton or Bush. I'm sorry, as this thread is truly not about the US Election but simply for Clinton supporters to reassure each other and fight off anyone who invades their "safe space," even when the weight of the evidence and reality comes crumbling down on them.

"At one point" he was never gonna win.

[Reza]

Originally posted by RatedG²

Umm Giselle is right. Her image is ****ed. Have you seen her unfavorables?


Clearly she needs to rebuild it. Giselle said nothing wrong

She's done literally nothing to mess up her image during this primary so there is nothing she can do to "rebuild" her image. like I said she will continue to make her case that she is the best person to be President of the US by speaking about her policies and image for the future.

[brianc33616]

Originally posted by Retro

I'm a part of the Democratic Party that gave us John Fitzgerald Kennedy, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Elizabeth Warren, Barack Obama, and now Hillary Rodham Clinton, to name a few stellar and high-profile warriors for progress and liberty.

Not sure which one you're talking about.

JFK was a champion of liberty. The others you mentioned have nothing in common with Kennedy. That's why the Democrats murdered JFK -- because he championed freedom and liberty!