[King Maxx]

Why would Bernie drop out when he has 3 weeks left? Those weeks will come fast, and it'll be over.

Dropping out now would make these last few million voters act like their vote does not matter, and the BernieBots will obviously call a conspiracy. Let the process play itself out.

[Javan]

Originally posted by King Maxx

We're talking about Hillary Clinton being in this same position as a male. Forget the actual scenarios that would happen (such as if she would still be married to Bill. I see you gay Bill. )

For this conversation only, if Hillary was magically turned into a male tonight and the voters memories of her being a female were wiped clean. Would she still be as scrutinized and judged? Absolutely freaking not.

All the candidates are judged and scrutinised. Like every single one of them have been beaten up

The sexism here is y'all treating Hillary like some weak fragile little girl. Like she deserves a free pass from judgment just because she's got a *****. Everyone gets ****. Stop whining.

[Bloo]

Originally posted by Javan

All the candidates are judged and scrutinised. Like every single one of them have been beaten up

The sexism here is y'all treating Hillary like some weak fragile little girl. Like she deserves a free pass from judgment just because she's got a *****. Everyone gets ****. Stop whining.

They have done studies and found that Hillary has has SIGNIFICANTLY more negative coverage than any other candidate. Even Trump!! :deadbana2:

We're not treating her like some weak fragile girl. Recognizing the sexism she faces doesn't make her weak, it makes her much stronger than any of the other candidates. I doubt Bernie, Cruz, Kasich, or any other candidate besides Trump could handle the negative coverage she had.

[Beatz]

Originally posted by King Maxx

Why would Bernie drop out when he has 3 weeks left? Those weeks will come fast, and it'll be over.

Dropping out now would make these last few million voters act like their vote does not matter, and the BernieBots will obviously call a conspiracy. Let the process play itself out.

He's just dragging it out, this will hurt Hillary in the long run, BernieBots are revolting **** his fake ass "revolution".

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/0...clinton-223342

This Politico article is revealing, Hillary and democrats are in big trouble...

[vuelve88]

Spends decades of his political career as an Independent, yet expects the DNC to suddenly accommodate him and his terms after less than a year of him associating with the party.

The delusion and entitlement is strong.

[YSL]

"The Sanders campaign placed the blame squarely on Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s leadership, accusing her of “throwing shade” on the Vermont senator from the beginning."

Is the 'Sanders campaign' actually just Marvin?

I can't wait for June already, this is getting old.

[King Maxx]

Bernie is hurting Hillary and the Democrats just as much as she was hurting Obama and them in 08. They are dragging it, and both sides want it to be over, but it is not. So we're a little anxious right now. But to say he is hurting her and the party's image and ideological stances are just not easy to calculate just yet. Especially since all he is saying has been used against her for decades now. And the disenfranchised would've still been disenfranchised with or without him.

[Javan]

Originally posted by Bloo

They have done studies and found that Hillary has has SIGNIFICANTLY more negative coverage than any other candidate. Even Trump!! :deadbana2:

Reciepts

Originally posted by Bloo

We're not treating her like some weak fragile girl.

Yes you are. Because her supporters are playing the card primarily as a means to defend her. Ergo when Bernie interrupted her in one debate y'all cried sexism. When anyone else interrupts a candidate... Silence. Goodbye

[Giselle]

Originally posted by Javan

All the candidates are judged and scrutinised. Like every single one of them have been beaten up

The sexism here is y'all treating Hillary like some weak fragile little girl. Like she deserves a free pass from judgment just because she's got a *****. Everyone gets ****. Stop whining.

As they should. However, there is a difference in the way women and men receive criticism, what they are criticized for and how they are allowed to respond to criticism. Much of the criticism against her has been gender based and unfair. To deny that would be tone-deaf.

[Retro]

Originally posted by Beatz

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/0...ox-news-223344

For the first time ever Trump leads Clinton in a national poll

>fox

k

[Retro]

If we lose in November I'm def blaming Bernie.

[Bloo]

Originally posted by Javan

Reciepts

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/04...ies-all/209945

Yes you are. Because her supporters are playing the card primarily as a means to defend her. Ergo when Bernie interrupted her in one debate y'all cried sexism. When anyone else interrupts a candidate... Silence. Goodbye

The people in this thread simply said that it had a harsh tone and will be interpreted as sexiat. If you're gonna claim something, at least get it right. Further, Bernie was also found to interrupt much more than any other Democratic candidate.
http://www.vocativ.com/295404/wait-your-turn-bern/

[King Maxx]

Originally posted by Javan

All the candidates are judged and scrutinised. Like every single one of them have been beaten up

The sexism here is y'all treating Hillary like some weak fragile little girl. Like she deserves a free pass from judgment just because she's got a *****. Everyone gets ****. Stop whining.

Only Hillary has to still deal with her husband's infidelity 25 years later.

Remember the small hands jokes. It last about 2 weeks. Remember the Cruz sex scandal mess that was going on. It lasted shorter. About a week. So no don't tell me sexism is not real. Had Hillary said or had been involved in any of that. She would've been shamed not only from Republicans but her own party.

[King Maxx]

And I don't actually believe the world is all sexist and out to get her. I think they just hate that this woman, who was First Lady, is smarter and more prepared than they are. They can't attack her on policies.

[Bloo]

Anyone saying Hillary hasn't had gendered criticism is blind, uninformed, delusional, sexist themselves, or an effective combination of any of these. Hillary is the only candidate to have been criticized for not smiling enough during a victory speech, for what she wears, for her "cackling" sounding insincere, etc. Carly Fiorina is the only other candidate to have had gendered criticism, such as when Trump insulted her face.

[brianc33616]

It appears Bernie is getting the Ron Paul treatment from the DNC thanks to DWS, and I don't even like him. http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/05/...-averse-media/

Hopefully this is enough reason for his supporters to vote Libertarian or Green in November, because Clinton certainly doesn't have Sanders' supporters' interests in mind. There's more than enough anti-Trump+anti-Clinton voters to prevent either of the two from getting elected (about 52% say they would never vote for either Clinton or Trump).

And Clinton is backing down on her promise to debate Sanders prior to the California primary. http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/...-in-california

There are other options out there that allow people to avoid throwing away their votes on the "evils" -- Hillary and Trump. There's still nearly six months to help Americans understand they can actually vote for principle and not waste their ballots on the Political Duopoly.

[Bloo]

Originally posted by brianc33616

It appears Bernie is getting the Ron Paul treatment from the DNC thanks to DWS, and I don't even like him. http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/05/...-averse-media/

Hopefully this is enough reason for his supporters to vote Libertarian or Green in November, because Clinton certainly doesn't have Sanders' supporters' interests in mind. There's more than enough anti-Trump+anti-Clinton voters to prevent either of the two from getting elected (about 52% say they would never vote for either Clinton or Trump).

And Clinton is backing down on her promise to debate Sanders prior to the California primary. http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/...-in-california

There are other options out there that allow people to avoid throwing away their votes on the "evils" -- Hillary and Trump. There's still nearly six months to help Americans understand they can actually vote for principle and not waste their ballots on the Political Duopoly.

You have a poor understanding of how elections work. Let's say Bernie's supporters, all of them, flocked to a third party candidate. That means no single candidate would get a majority of delegates in the GE and then the House decides, which means the Republicans decide who wins, which would mean Trump.

[King Maxx]

Originally posted by brianc33616

It appears Bernie is getting the Ron Paul treatment from the DNC thanks to DWS, and I don't even like him. http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/05/...-averse-media/

Hopefully this is enough reason for his supporters to vote Libertarian or Green in November, because Clinton certainly doesn't have Sanders' supporters' interests in mind. There's more than enough anti-Trump+anti-Clinton voters to prevent either of the two from getting elected (about 52% say they would never vote for either Clinton or Trump).

And Clinton is backing down on her promise to debate Sanders prior to the California primary. http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/...-in-california

There are other options out there that allow people to avoid throwing away their votes on the "evils" -- Hillary and Trump. There's still nearly six months to help Americans understand they can actually vote for principle and not waste their ballots on the Political Duopoly.

Sorry. #ClintonorTrump for president. A third party won't happen, and stop recruiting that -10% of millions of Bernie supporters who won't vote for her. They won't even get you 1% of the total popular vote.

[Retro]

Originally posted by brianc33616

It appears Bernie is getting the Ron Paul treatment from the DNC thanks to DWS, and I don't even like him. http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/05/...-averse-media/

Hopefully this is enough reason for his supporters to vote Libertarian or Green in November, because Clinton certainly doesn't have Sanders' supporters' interests in mind. There's more than enough anti-Trump+anti-Clinton voters to prevent either of the two from getting elected (about 52% say they would never vote for either Clinton or Trump).

And Clinton is backing down on her promise to debate Sanders prior to the California primary. http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/...-in-california

There are other options out there that allow people to avoid throwing away their votes on the "evils" -- Hillary and Trump. There's still nearly six months to help Americans understand they can actually vote for principle and not waste their ballots on the Political Duopoly.

so basically you're saying you want Trump since you probably know there's no realistic way a president will not be one of the two primary nominees

k then

[vuelve88]

Originally posted by brianc33616

Hopefully this is enough reason for his supporters to vote Libertarian or Green in November...There's more than enough anti-Trump+anti-Clinton voters to prevent either of the two from getting elected (about 52% say they would never vote for either Clinton or Trump).

No and no.

So much typing and still so much wrong.