And until then, Bernie has every right to do what he thinks he should be doing!
No, sorry, I don't give a flying **** what the DNC says (and interestingly, neither have Bernie or his supporters until now). I'm talking about reality. It's over.
It's not a stupid rule. Again, if you don't know what party you want to vote in six months after the race has been going on, when there are only two polar-opposite parties too vote in, that's your problem. Information is always available. If your ONLY source of getting information about the election is debates, again, that is your problem.
It's not a stupid rule. Again, if you don't know what party you want to vote in six months after the race has been going on, when there are only two polar-opposite parties too vote in, that's your problem. Information is always available. If your ONLY source of getting information about the election is debates, again, that is your problem.
There's nothing unethical about it. High profile people will obviously command large paychecks for anything they do. And Hillary is as high as high profile gets.
There's nothing unethical about it. High profile people will obviously command large paychecks for anything they do. And Hillary is as high as high profile gets.
No, that's not point. If she had officially announced and done it she would have broken the law. She did everything but announce officially and let it be known she was running and took the money
No, that's not point. If she had officially announced and done it she would have broken the law. She did everything but announce officially and let it be known she was running and took the money
Retro. If she wins CA comfortably (let's say by 10. She may very well do more than that), is it possible for Sanders to overtake her in pledged delegates mathematically?
I know you said if she wins 50.1% to 49.9% he has to make her non viable but...just wanna know
Says the biggest troll in the entire thread that can only make poor attempts at witty one-liners and fails to post anything of substance? What an ironic kii.
Ironic when Bernie's the only one under investigation for illegal campaign contributions.
Nothing will come of it, just like Hillary's email investigation
Quote:
Originally posted by Bloo
Says the biggest troll in the entire thread that can only make poor attempts at witty one-liners and fails to post anything of substance? What an ironic kii.
I don't think I would have 2,000 posts in here if that was true.
The more I look into politics the more I realize that Hillary is a good candidate and the more I realize that she is going to win the nomination and the presidency.
I realized this before I voted, but I still voted for Bernie anyway to support his policies. But now I'm not so sure if I should have even voted for him because of this contribution scandal. Can someone give me a rundown of what his campaign is accused of doing?