[BlueTimberwolf]

Originally posted by Benzene

Bernie brats going crazy over Clinton financial disclosures. So mad that successful people like the Clintons are in demand for speaking assignments. Perpetual do-nothing lifelong failures like Bernie are never in demand, of course he won't have comparable speaking fees.

I think the issue is that she was taking money while everyone knew she was running for president, skirting the laws

[Marvin]

Originally posted by IcarusIsFlying

Fuming because Bernie's ego is hurting Hillary and increasing the chance of a Trump presidency, which would actually affect peoples lives? Yeah

But I thought there was no way she'd lose the election? What Bernie does shouldn't be affecting her if everyone in here is so sure she'll beat Trump no matter what.

You guys call him a fake Democrat then gets mad when he talks about his opponent, even though the race is still going on. You say Hillary has nothing to worry about, but are still mad over Bernie and his campaign

[Redstreak]

Originally posted by IcarusIsFlying

Fuming because Bernie's ego is hurting Hillary and increasing the chance of a Trump presidency, which would actually affect peoples lives? Yeah

From the latest consistency of polls and voter data, the only thing that seems to be increasing the chances of a Trump presidency are the increases in likelihood of a Clinton nomination

[Marvin]

Originally posted by RatedG²

I really like it when he says we should talk about certain progressive issues and really like it when he turns his guns into Trump

Same

[Benzene]

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf

I think the issue is that she was taking money while everyone knew she was running for president, skirting the laws

There's no law against that.

The only person prohibited by law to take money for speeches is Bernie since he's the only active politician.

[Giselle]

Originally posted by Marvin

There was one Democratic debate and two Republican debates before the deadline. Not everyone pays attention to the race so far away. Sorry that you don't understand that.

One, we live in the age of the internet. Information is instantly accessible. There only being a few debates is no excuse. And you don't even need to pay close attention to the race to know if you're liberal or conservative.

Not knowing the rules doesn't mean you're experiencing voter suppression.

[Retro]

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf

I think the issue is that she was taking money while everyone knew she was running for president, skirting the laws

But that shouldn't matter. It was not campaign season, she was not actively in office at the time, and we really didn't know for sure she'd run because she was being so quiet about her decision.

I mean, I don't believe for a second she didn't decide until December 2014, but I don't feel that anything before the day she announced the campaign should matter.

[YSL]

Bernie supporters want everything handed to them but they don't want to put in the work. A prime example of the kind of voters they are is Nevada. They had MONTHS after the primary to change their party affiliation and yet 60 of them couldn't switch to Democrat. Probably because they aren't real democrats and just want be apart of a revolution without putting in the work.

Originally posted by IcarusIsFlying

Jane ran on stage to whisper to Bernie that he won Oregon, but was audible in the microphone

Bernie - "What percentage?"
Jane - "I don't know, they just called it. It's not that big."



Edit: https://twitter.com/ErrolCNN/status/732781505081008132

Side bar, who is Errol Barnett? He can get it.

[Benzene]

Hillary will win in November.

Bernie is still a trashbox regardless.

[Bloo]

TYT is talking about texting and driving right now.... They haven't mentioned Bernie in the past 10 minutes... Are they okay?

[masegoRih]

Originally posted by IcarusIsFlying

Jane ran on stage to whisper to Bernie that he won Oregon, but was audible in the microphone

Bernie - "What percentage?"
Jane - "I don't know, they just called it. It's not that big."



Edit: https://twitter.com/ErrolCNN/status/732781505081008132

Mess

[BlueTimberwolf]

Originally posted by Benzene

There's no law against that.

The only person prohibited by law to take money for speeches is Bernie since he's the only active politician.

But it is highly unethical, which is the point.

[Retro]

Originally posted by Redstreak

From the latest consistency of polls and voter data, the only thing that seems to be increasing the chances of a Trump presidency are the increases in likelihood of a Clinton nomination

This is crap and you totally know it. There is no correlation and just 2% of voters nationally, probably at most in reality, change preference if Hillary is the nominee rather than Bernie, and they move to third party candidates.

[Benzene]

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf

But it is highly unethical, which is the point.

Not really. Successful people get to set high demands. Some people are apparently very bitter about this.

[Retro]

Originally posted by Marvin

But I thought there was no way she'd lose the election? What Bernie does shouldn't be affecting her if everyone in here is so sure she'll beat Trump no matter what.

You guys call him a fake Democrat then gets mad when he talks about his opponent, even though the race is still going on. You say Hillary has nothing to worry about, but are still mad over Bernie and his campaign

The race is NOT still going on. It is OVER in every sense of the word besides mathematical impossibility, which is rapidly approaching.

[Marvin]

Originally posted by Giselle

One, we live in the age of the internet. Information is instantly accessible. There only being a few debates is no excuse. And you don't even need to pay close attention to the race to know if you're liberal or conservative.

Not knowing the rules doesn't mean you're experiencing voter suppression.

The fact that you're using these excuses for a stupid rule

Being in the internet age doesn't anything. People should be able to register the day of the primary. I have yet to see a valid reason for why they shouldn't be able to.

[Giselle]

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf

I think the issue is that she was taking money while everyone knew she was running for president, skirting the laws

Show me the law that says you can't do speaking engagements while running for President? And then show me the law that says you can't do speaking engagements if you are not currently running, but might run later in life. And considering whenever asked, she repeatedly said "No" or "Not likely", there was no way anyone would know that.

There was a profile done in Vanity Fair about her close aides and staffers which said she genuinely did not plan on running after she left the State Dept.

[Marvin]

Originally posted by Retro

The race is NOT still going on. It is OVER in every sense of the word besides mathematical impossibility, which is rapidly approaching.

According to the DNC it's not

And until then, Bernie has every right to do what he thinks he should be doing!

[Bloo]

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf

But it is highly unethical, which is the point.

Larry The Cable Guy got paid over $200,000 for a speech. Who the **** cares? When you're successful, people want to hear you speak. It's not a scandalous occurrence.

[Bloo]

Originally posted by Marvin

According to the DNC it's not

And until then, Bernie has every right to do what he thinks he should be doing!

He does. But, it's still over from a mathematical standpoint.