Because it's not only about a C+ rating. It's also about the average error rating (among other things) and it's superbly low for a pollster that doesn't do polls every week. For most of the primaries they polled this cycle they've been accurate about the winner and pretty darn close with the amount
No shade, but wouldn't winning by ~10 points be rather disappointing? The nomination is hers either way, don't get me wrong, but since NY is her state and she's so popular, I figure that anything less than a 15 point win would be underwhelming?
No shade, but wouldn't winning by ~10 points be rather disappointing? The nomination is hers either way, don't get me wrong, but since NY is her state and she's so popular, I figure that anything less than a 15 point win would be underwhelming?
Considering New York's population, 10% is gargantuan (on top of what she'll already win).
Considering New York's population, 10% is gargantuan (on top of what she'll already win).
Well yeah, but considering Trump has a 34 point lead in the same poll (against two other candidates), I thought Hillary's lead would be a lot more commanding.
Or is Trump more popular than her in NY? I don't know what his rep is like.
For those who want to know how difficult it would be for Bernie to turn this thing around. While it may not be impossible for him to overcome her in pledged delegates, it is practically impossible for him to beat her in popular votes.
A surge is a surge. It's moving in the right direction.
