Discussion: U.S. Election 2016: Primary Season - Page 1026

Ramcoro

Quote:

Originally posted by Marvin

Probably November 9.

2016 or 2020?

King Maxx

Quote:

Originally posted by Marvin

Probably November 9.

So they'll release a day after she wins. If it's nothing, that'll prove they were just after her and wanted to ruin her campaign. If she's indicted and possibly is guilty, then her VP becomes president?

We win either way. So yeah wait until Nov 9 FBI.

Marvin

Quote:

Originally posted by Ramcoro

2016 or 2020?

2016 but it was a joke; the day after the elections.

Quote:

Originally posted by King Maxx

So they'll release a day after she wins. If it's nothing, that'll prove they were just after her and wanted to ruin her campaign. If she's indicted and possibly is guilty, then her VP becomes president?

We win either way. So yeah wait until Nov 9 FBI.

You'd like that wouldn't you?

I don't know when they'll be done tbh. I don't think there's any way to find out how much progress they've made with the case.

BlueTimberwolf

https://twitter.com/JustinFishelABC/...69203009585152

In this email Hilary admits that there is the potential for classified information to find it's way into her server. Why else would she need this aide to even check? This is basically an admission that she was aware classified info was being sent to her server, right?

King Maxx

Well good that she wanted to know if important information was classified or not before sending it to one of the biggest media outlet. That just shows she wanted to be careful, and never had intentions to use the server for wrong reasons.

BlueTimberwolf

Quote:

Originally posted by King Maxx

Well good that she wants to know if important information was classified or not before sending it to one of biggest media outlet. That just shows she wanted to be careful, and never had intention to use the server for wrong reasons.

Why would she even need to ask if there was no possibility for classified info to be on her server?

hooky

Here's something about the election of 1872:

Quote:

On November 29, 1872, after the popular vote, but before the Electoral College cast its votes, Greeley died. As a result, electors previously committed to Greeley voted for four different candidates for president, and eight different candidates for vice-president. Greeley himself received three posthumous electoral votes, but these votes were disallowed by Congress. The election was the first in which every competing state used a popular vote to determine its electors; since 1832, South Carolina had been the lone state to decide electors by the state legislature. Florida's legislature had decided its electors in 1868. The election of 1872 is the only US presidential election in which a candidate has died during the electoral process.

I suppose it's possible that something similar to the votes being nulled could happen if Hillary gets indicted, but she'd still be alive, so...

A more likely scenario is that electors decide to change their votes before they're actually counted.

Reza

ATRL members (21 and over) should play a game tomorrow. Everyone take a shot for every state Hillary/Trump wins.

King Maxx

Quote:

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf

Why would she even need to ask if there was no possibility for classified info to be on her server?

She probably wasn't aware if that information she wanted to be sent to NYTimes was still considered classified or not.

Did it really say that the info was already on the server? Or was it just info they knew that they wanted to send through that email. That's the difference. It never said the "classified" info was already being discussed in the emails to others.

EDIT: Wait is the Jihadi subject info the supposed classified info? If so then yes, that shouldn't have been discussed in email. But that doesn't seem like the actual info on that particular subject.

BlueTimberwolf

Also, are her subordinates cleared to be determiners of what is classified b4 sending it to the Times?

BlueTimberwolf

Quote:

Originally posted by King Maxx

She probably wasn't aware if that information she wanted to be sent to NYTimes was still considered classified or not.

Did it really say that the info was already on the server? Or was it just info they knew that they wanted to send through that email. That's the difference. It never said the "classified" info was already being discussed in the emails to others.

The ABC reporter is saying it was already in her email, which would also be in her server. The subordinate would then check the classification and send it to the Times.

King Maxx

Quote:

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf

The ABC reporter is saying it was already in her email, which would also be in her server. The subordinate would then check the classification and send it to the Times.

Yeah but those emails don't show the info, right? How do we know the reporter knows that? Or am I not understanding the email correctly?

Jonna Lee

who is this and why is he being promoted on my facebook as the next dem candidate ddd

King Maxx

Quote:

Originally posted by Jonna Lee

who is this and why is he being promoted on my facebook as the next dem candidate ddd

Some unknown who had enough money to be on the ballot but winning less than 0.1% of the delegates so far.. I never get why these people run. There is a black man running as well. He was outraged after losing SC.

Tinker

Quote:

Originally posted by LuLuDrops

They probably want to keep things "exciting" and leave us last

We do smash hopes and dreams quickly though, in 2012 GOP was leading by a bit then BAM California came with the left hook and Obama led the rest of the night

I mean it's simply not fair but i understand. And besides by then, we will know the democrat nominee for sure. Infact, we might even know that tmr.

Jonna Lee

Quote:

Originally posted by King Maxx

Some unknown who had enough money to be on the ballot but winning less than 0.1% of the delegates so far.. I never get why these people run. There is a black man running as well. He was outraged after losing SC.

Willie Wilson

I was jokingly stanning him the other day.

BlueTimberwolf

Quote:

Originally posted by Mickey

From what I've read, she was against it because it was bad for Colombian workers. Then, a few years later, during the Obama administration, they added amendments to address these issues, and so she became for it.

Three Years After Colombia Deal, Workers Still Face Violence, Impunity and Unfair Working Conditions

Or Not?

Mickey

Quote:

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf

https://twitter.com/JustinFishelABC/...69203009585152

In this email Hilary admits that there is the potential for classified information to find it's way into her server. Why else would she need this aide to even check? This is basically an admission that she was aware classified info was being sent to her server, right?

I read the email and it seems that they were talking about content in a link? Stuff that you have to click a link to get to isn't on the server? Am I completely misunderstanding?

Mickey

Quote:

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf

Three Years After Colombia Deal, Workers Still Face Violence, Impunity and Unfair Working Conditions

Or Not?

I will admit I am unfamiliar with the details of this deal, but from reading that article it sounds like Colombia promised to do something and then didn't, which matches the story

BlueTimberwolf

Quote:

Originally posted by Mickey

I read the email and it seems that they were talking about content in a link? Stuff that you have to click a link to get to isn't on the server? Am I completely misunderstanding?

It seems to be about a program to spy on Jihadi websites