Back to ATRL
This is
Classic ATRL
, an interactive archive of our original website.
Music News
Charts
Videos
Celebria
Base
The Lounge
Best Of
YTT
Games
TRL Archive
User Name
Remember Me
Password
Members who joined ATRL prior to 2017, sign in here.
Any changes made to your password do not sync.
Classic ATRL
>
Base
>
Discussion: Why didn't BOMT stay at #1 longer than 2 weeks...
Sign In
Discussion: Why didn't BOMT stay at #1 longer than 2 weeks...
Page 1 of 2
1
2
Next >
Last Post
Actions
D.M.F
Member Since: 11/25/2008
Posts: 13,160
Thread Starter
|
Post #1
Why didn't BOMT stay at #1 longer than 2 weeks...
Why didn't BOMT stay at #1 longer than just 2 weeks on the biggest chart in the world: The HOT 100?
Miley Cyrus
Member Since: 3/15/2013
Posts: 7,898
Post #2
Not enough talent.
Planet Mars
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 8,150
Post #3
U should have asked this 17 years ago ****
Courtney Love
Member Since: 8/7/2015
Posts: 3,607
Post #4
Forgettable, quick lil single, no impact.
Bounce
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 27,490
Post #5
No longevity
Aqua
ATRL Contributor
Member Since: 8/7/2015
Posts: 13,353
Post #6
Does it really matter when it's one of the most successful songs of all time, D.M.F.?
Lucyyyyyyyyy
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 24,895
Post #7
let me call Billboard and ask
Yanko
Member Since: 8/7/2015
Posts: 10,438
Post #8
because it didnt have legend x on it
Scotty
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 8,746
Post #9
Quote:
Originally posted by
Miley Cyrus
Not enough talent.
Courtney Love
Member Since: 8/7/2015
Posts: 3,607
Post #10
It didn't feature Legend X
hitmebby1morex
Member Since: 8/6/2015
Posts: 8,372
Post #11
To give you something to talk about 17 years later
Caprice
Member Since: 8/7/2015
Posts: 6,930
Post #12
All the Fighters in the thread when the last time their fave had a N°1 was before they were born.
ThisGuyTony
Member Since: 4/3/2014
Posts: 199
Post #13
Yet it was ranked higher on Billboard Year-End Hot 100 singles of 1999 list than other songs that spent more time at #1.. .
PoisonPill
Member Since: 8/6/2012
Posts: 8,639
Post #14
There was a much faster turnover at #1 in that era. Why hasn't Xtina has a solo #1 since the year 2000?
itsnickcray
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 1,977
Post #15
She didn't end up on a washed up show without a career, without solo hits, without world tours. The new generation can't even name a Christina song.
Christina's timeline of success (and fame) ended in 2006 sadly...
MovinKindaSlow
Member Since: 8/19/2011
Posts: 10,690
Post #16
Chart run: 17-14-18-9-8-5-4-4-4-3-*1*-1-2-2-4-5-8-11-13-14-17-19-20-21-18-24-29-31-38-46-46-49
Weeks in the top 3: Five
Weeks in the top 5: Eleven
Weeks in the top 10: Fourteen
Weeks in the top 20: Twenty three
liberalmusiclover
Member Since: 5/3/2012
Posts: 42,099
Post #17
It was her Disturbia.
aquarius
Member Since: 8/7/2015
Posts: 3,424
Post #18
because legend x is a lead artist on say something
-ToxicGuy-
Member Since: 11/25/2008
Posts: 6,349
Post #19
Quote:
Originally posted by
ThisGuyTony
Yet it was ranked higher on Billboard Year-End Hot 100 singles of 1999 list than other songs that spent more time at #1.. .
areaos
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 1,333
Post #20
Quote:
Originally posted by
aquarius
because legend x is a lead artist on say something
Page 1 of 2
1
2
Next >
Actions for this Thread
Print this Thread
"Absolute TRL" 1999-2006; "Popfusion" 2006-2007; "ATRL" 2007-present
