Quote:
Originally posted by heckinglovato
Thank you for refusing to answer the questions we raised and instead replying with "Bernie stans :toffunny3: then talking about how you would flip-flop back to the QUEEN when it's GE time.
This isn't a stan war. This is politics. Clinton and Trump are two completely opposite people. Please collect some more information.
|
Trump and Clinton are closer to each other than Trump is to Sanders.
I view Clinton more as a centralist, and Sanders as far left(?) in the democratic scale.
Trump is surprisingly very moderate compared to the likes of Bush, etc...
So they are more close to each other, because they agree on what exactly the problems are in the country.. they just have strikingly different way of approach to it.
Example:
I agree that something must be done with the illegal immigration problem.
Both Hillary and Trump agrees on the problem.
Their approach:
Trump wants them all deported in a year.. all 11 million of them: I strongly disagree on this. Deporting 11 million people will cost taxpayers so much money. So either let them stay and give them a chance to contribute to the society, or come up with a plan where deportation is gradual and the impact is negligible to the economy.
Hillary wants 11 million illegal immigrants to have a chance for citizenship: I despise this a LOT, since it's very insulting to the immigrants who spent so much just to come here through legal means, and have been through a lot of strict protocols and policies just to even be qualified, and yet we have all these 11 million border jumping aliens who are in for economic vulturing, and now they have a chance to be a full American citizen?
Weighing those in, Hillary's belief is a lot more unfair than that of Trump. So in that sense, I would lean towards Trump on this issue. IT would have been perfect if he would change his goal to deport 11 million in a span of 10 years, not in a span of a year. Radical change destroys the foundation that the last 25 years has built.